Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RATTO, S.
Right arrow Articles by FAVALE, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RATTO, S.
Right arrow Articles by FAVALE, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 106, No. 4, 897-909, 1983
© 1983 Guarantors of Brain

research-article

SURFACE RECORDING OF THE SPINAL VENTRAL ROOT DISCHARGE IN MAN

AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY

SANDRO RATTO, MICHELE ABBRUZZESE, GIOVANNI ABBRUZZESE and EMILIO FAVALE

Department of Neurology, University of Genoa, Via A De Toni 5, Genoa, Italy

The response evoked by stimulation of the tibial nerve was recorded by surface electrodes over the humbosacral spine at multiple levels with both monopolar and bipolar recordings.

When the stimulus strength was adjusted to elicit a maximal H reflex, bipolar recordings showed a negative-postive deflection (W1), increasing in latency in the rostral direction and classically attributed to the propagated action potentials in the dorsal roots, followed by a previously unreported positive-negative deflectionW3showing the opposite sequence, namely, with latency decreasing in the rostral direction. A similar pattern was found in monopolar recordings in which, however, the peak corresponding in time to W3 was partially obscured by a fixed latency component (W2, particularly prominent over the upper lumbar vertebrae.

When an intensity corresponding to the maximal M wave was employed, W2 showed a remarkable increase in amplitude, while both W3 and the H reflex disappeared. Several experimental techniques, either suppressing or enhancing the H response, confirmed the strict parallelism existing between this reflex and the W3component.

These findings suggest that W3 represents the reflexly evoked ventral root discharge. This was confirmed by concurrent intrathecal and surface recordings of the lumbosacral spinal evoked activity. W2 is probably generated by the postsynaptic activation of spinal neurons located in segments receiving the tibial nerve afferents, the motoneuronal contribution to this fixed latency component being slight or absent.

Received December 7, 1982. Accepted March 22, 1983.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
D. Restuccia, A. Insola, M. Valeriani, V. Santilli, L. Bedini, D. Le Pera, C. Barba, F. Denaro, and P. Tonali
Somatosensory evoked potentials after multisegmental lower limb stimulation in focal lesions of the lumbosacral spinal cord
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 2000; 69(1): 91 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.