Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (119)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BISIACH, E.
Right arrow Articles by VALLAR, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BISIACH, E.
Right arrow Articles by VALLAR, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 107, No. 1, 37-52, 1984
© 1984 Oxford University Press


research-article

DISORDERS OF PERCEIVED AUDITORY LATERALIZATION AFTER LESIONS OF THE RIGHT HEMISPHERE

E. BISIACH, L. CORNACCHIA, R. STERZI and G. VALLAR1

From the Istituto di Clinica Neurologica, Università di Milano and the Istituto di Audiologia, Università di Milano

Correspondence to: 1 Reprint requests to Dr Giuseppe Vallar, Istituto di Clinica Neurologica, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milano, Italy.

The disorders of perceived auditory lateralization after unilateral damage of the cerebral hemispheres were investigated by dichotic presentation of pure tones, lateralization being obtained by interaural intensity differences. Observations were made on 107 unilateral brain-damaged patients and 30 normal subjects who were required to localize the perceived position of fused sound images. The images were generated by dichotic stimuli delivered through headphones and the patients were asked to point the perceived position.

A clear-cut hemispheric asymmetry was found. Whereas left brain-damaged patients and right brain-damaged patients without visual field defects were not impaired in this task in comparison with controls, the performance of right brain-damaged patients with visual field defects was defective, with a systematic directional error towards the right side, that is, the side ipsilateral to the damaged hemisphere. The defect of auditory lateralization involved both the half-space contralateral to the lesion and the ipsilateral one.

Different hypotheses are discussed in order to explain the present results. It is argued that they cannot easily be interpreted in terms of defective processing of sensory information and the proposal is made that lesions of the right hemisphere may produce a distortion of the internal representation of egocentric space to the right, yielding a systematic error of auditory lateralization. The site and the extent of the right hemisphere lesions producing the disorder of auditory lateralization are discussed.

Received September 30, 1982. Revised April 21, 1983.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Atten Percept PsychophysHome page
C. A. Dickinson and H. Intraub
Spatial asymmetries in viewing and remembering scenes: Consequences of an attentional bias?
Atten Percept Psychophys, August 1, 2009; 71(6): 1251 - 1262.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. Spierer, A. Bellmann-Thiran, P. Maeder, M. M. Murray, and S. Clarke
Hemispheric competence for auditory spatial representation
Brain, July 1, 2009; 132(7): 1953 - 1966.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. L. Grady, H. Yu, and C. Alain
Age-Related Differences in Brain Activity Underlying Working Memory for Spatial and Nonspatial Auditory Information
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 189 - 199.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Han, Y. Jiang, H. Gu, H. Rao, L. Mao, Y. Cui, and R. Zhai
The role of human parietal cortex in attention networks
Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 650 - 659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
R. J. Zatorre and V. B. Penhune
Spatial Localization after Excision of Human Auditory Cortex
J. Neurosci., August 15, 2001; 21(16): 6321 - 6328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Bellmann, R. Meuli, and S. Clarke
Two types of auditory neglect
Brain, April 1, 2001; 124(4): 676 - 687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S Sonoda, M Mori, and A Goishi
Pattern of localisation error in patients with stroke to sound processed by a binaural sound space processor
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2001; 70(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
R. S. Bolia, W. T. Nelson, and R. M. Morley
Asymmetric Performance in the Cocktail Party Effect: Implications for the Design of Spatial Audio Displays
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2001; 43(2): 208 - 216.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Martinkauppi, P. Rama, H.J. Aronen, A. Korvenoja, and S. Carlson
Working Memory of Auditory Localization
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2000; 10(9): 889 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. Kaiser, W. Lutzenberger, H. Preissl, H. Ackermann, and N. Birbaumer
Right-Hemisphere Dominance for the Processing of Sound-Source Lateralization
J. Neurosci., September 1, 2000; 20(17): 6631 - 6639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. Y. Deouell, S. Bentin, and N. Soroker
Electrophysiological evidence for an early (pre-attentive) information processing deficit in patients with right hemisphere damage and unilateral neglect
Brain, February 1, 2000; 123(2): 353 - 365.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.