Brain, Vol. 107, No. 4, 1143-1163, 1984
© 1984 Guarantors of Brain
research-article |
VISUAL STABILIZATION OF POSTURE
PHYSIOLOGICAL STIMULUS CHARACTERISTICS AND CLINICAL ASPECTS
Neurological Clinic and Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Alfried Krupp Hospital 4300 Essen, Federal Republic of Germany
Visual stabilization of posture is critically dependent on stimulus characteristics as well as on the performance of the visual system. The purpose of the present investigation was to obtain quantitative data in man by means of posturography of fore-aft and lateral body sway in relation to different visual stimulus characteristics.
Visual acuity, when decreased logarithmically, causes a linearly increasing postural instability, twice as prominent for fore-aft than for lateral sway. Any measurable visual contribution for fore-aft sway ceases with an acuity lower than 0.03 and for lateral sway with an acuity lower than 0.01.
The central area of the visual field as compared with the peripheral retina dominates postural control. The foveal region exhibts a powerful contribution, in particular for lateral sway.
A partial but significant visual stabilization is preserved with a visual input rate between 1 to 4 Hz flicker frequency. As soon as continuous motion perception becomes involved with frequencies higher than 4 Hz, visual stabilization gradually improves with a saturation at frequencies higher than 16 Hz.
Lateral body sway activity and eye-object distance are linearly related:body sway decreases with increasing distance corresponding to the linear decrease of net retinal displacement with increasing eye-object distance.
Aspects of ‘afferent’ and ‘efferent’ visual motion perception, which involve fore-aft and lateral body sway differently, are evaluated. The clinical relevance is demonstrated in patients with oculomotor distrubances. The results are discussed with respect to the variety of related clinical disorders, which involved reduction in visual acuity, field defects, accommodation disturbances and ocular oscillations.
.
Received January 19, 1984. Revised May 11, 1984.
1Present address: Neurological Clinic, University of Munich, Klinikum Großhadern, 8000 Munich, Republic of Germany.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. M. O'Connor and A. D. Kuo Direction-Dependent Control of Balance During Walking and Standing J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1411 - 1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. E. Freeman, A. T. Broman, K. A. Turano, and S. K. West Motion-Detection Threshold and Measures of Balance in Older Adults: The SEE Project Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 5257 - 5263. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Figueiro, L. Gras, R. Qi, P. Rizzo, M. Rea, and M. Rea A novel night lighting system for postural control and stability in seniors Lighting Research and Technology, June 1, 2008; 40(2): 111 - 126. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. W. KELLY, B. RIECKE, J. M. LOOMIS, and A. C. BEALL Visual control of posture in real and virtual environments Atten Percept Psychophys, January 1, 2008; 70(1): 158 - 165. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Schmid, A. Nardone, A. M. De Nunzio, M. Schmid, and M. Schieppati Equilibrium during static and dynamic tasks in blind subjects: no evidence of cross-modal plasticity Brain, August 1, 2007; 130(8): 2097 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. L. Day and M. Guerraz Feedforward versus feedback modulation of human vestibular-evoked balance responses by visual self-motion information J. Physiol., July 1, 2007; 582(1): 153 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Glasauer, E. Schneider, K. Jahn, M. Strupp, and T. Brandt How the eyes move the body Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1291 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. I. Simeonov, H. Hsiao, B. W. DotsonM, and D. E. Ammons Height Effects in Real and Virtual Environments Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2005; 47(2): 430 - 438. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Anand, J. G. Buckley, A. Scally, and D. B. Elliott Postural Stability Changes in the Elderly with Cataract Simulation and Refractive Blur Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2003; 44(11): 4670 - 4675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Anand, J. G. Buckley, A. Scally, and D. B. Elliott Postural Stability in the Elderly during Sensory Perturbations and Dual Tasking: The Influence of Refractive Blur Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 2885 - 2891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. I. Simeonov, H. Hsiao, B. W. Dotson, and D. E. Ammons Control and Perception of Balance at Elevated and Sloped Surfaces Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2003; 45(1): 136 - 147. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Jahn, M. Strupp, S. Krafczyk, O. Schuler, S. Glasauer, and T. Brandt Suppression of eye movements improves balance Brain, September 1, 2002; 125(9): 2005 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P Simeonov and H Hsiao Height, surface firmness, and visual reference effects on balance control Inj. Prev., September 1, 2001; 7(90001): i50 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. D Loram, S. M Kelly, and M. Lakie Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: is sway size controlled by ankle impedance? J. Physiol., May 1, 2001; 532(3): 879 - 891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Guerraz, J. Shallo–Hoffmann, K. Yarrow, K. V. Thilo, A. M. Bronstein, and M. A. Gresty Visual Control of Postural Orientation and Equilibrium in Congenital Nystagmus Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2000; 41(12): 3798 - 3804. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. G. Morasso and M. Schieppati Can Muscle Stiffness Alone Stabilize Upright Standing? J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1999; 82(3): 1622 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|