Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BAYNES, K.
Right arrow Articles by VOLPE, B. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BAYNES, K.
Right arrow Articles by VOLPE, B. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 109, No. 1, 99-114, 1986
© 1986 Oxford University Press


research-article

COMPONENTS OF VISUAL ATTENTION

ALTERATIONS IN RESPONSE PATTERN TO VISUAL STIMULI FOLLOWING PARIETAL LOBE INFARCTION

KATHLEEN BAYNES, JEFFREY D. HOLTZMAN and BRUCE T. VOLPE

The Department of Neurology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, and the Burke Rehabilitation Center White Plains, NY, USA

Correspondence to: Correspondence to Dr K. Baynes, Department of Neurology, Cornell University Medical College, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021.

The contribution of attentional factors per se in response to visual stimuli was studied in patients with unilateral lesions of the left or right cerebral hemispheres. Subjects were required to respond to visual targets that were presented tachistoscopically, and were preceded by spatial cues that served to manipulate the spatial locus of attention. On ‘valid’ cue trials, the cue directed attention to the target's spatial coordinates, on ‘invalid’ cue trials, the cue misdirected attention. It was determined that (1) damage to either the left or right hemisphere results in a general slowing of reaction times to visual stimuli irrespective of where such stimuli appear, and (2) that patients with right parietal lesions are further impaired at shifting attention within the left visual field

Received April 24, 1984. Revised April 30, 1985. Accepted May 21, 1985.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
R. Vandenberghe, J. Duncan, K. M. Arnell, S. J. Bishop, N. J. Herrod, A. M. Owen, P. S. Minhas, P. Dupont, J. D. Pickard, and G. A. Orban
Maintaining and Shifting Attention within Left or Right Hemifield
Cereb Cortex, July 1, 2000; 10(7): 706 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
P. O. Vuilleumier and R. D. Rafal
A systematic study of visual extinction: Between- and within-field deficits of attention in hemispatial neglect
Brain, June 1, 2000; 123(6): 1263 - 1279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
C.L. Colby
The Neuroanatomy and Neurophysiology of Attention
J Child Neurol, January 1, 1991; 6(1_suppl): S90 - S118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
O. Devinsky, D. Bear, and B. T. Volpe
Confusional States Following Posterior Cerebral Artery Infarction
Arch Neurol, February 1, 1988; 45(2): 160 - 163.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.