Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CODY, F. W. J.
Right arrow Articles by FERGUSON, I. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by CODY, F. W. J.
Right arrow Articles by FERGUSON, I. T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 110, No. 2, 433-450, 1987
© 1987 Oxford University Press


research-article

STRETCH AND VIBRATION REFLEXES OF WRIST FLEXOR MUSCLES IN SPASTICITY

F. W. J. CODY1,, HELEN C. RICHARDSON1, N. MACDERMOTT2 and I. T. FERGUSON2

1Department of Physiology, University of Manchester 2Department of Neurology, Manchester Royal Infirmary

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr F. W. J. Cody, Department of Physiology, Stopford Building, Manchester M13 9PT, UK

The surface electromyographic (EMG) reflex responses of the voluntarily contracting flexor carpi radialis evoked by ‘stretch ’ and by tendon vibration have been compared in patients with spasticity of the upper limb, arising from upper motor neuron lesions, and normal subjects. Reflex responses to ‘stretch’ comprised increases in EMG activity lasting up to 100 ms which were often divided into ‘short’ and ‘long’-latency peaks. The short-latency responses of spastic patients were increased in size compared with those of normal subjects whereas later activity was commonly reduced or absent. In both groups vibration elicited short-latency, essentially phasic responses with activity falling back to or below the background level within 50 ms despite continuing stimulation. These initial reflex responses were exaggerated in the spastics as compared with the normals. In the relaxed state ‘stretch’ and vibration either failed to elicit reflex responses in normal subjects or reflexes were of small amplitude; in spastic patients both modes of stimulation regularly evoked well developed responses.

These findings with ‘stretch’ and vibration, both of which forms of stimulation powerfully excite primary endings of muscle spindles, support the view that group la afferent-mediated reflex action is enhanced in spasticity. The observation that the normal long-latency responses evoked by stretch, which have been attributed to the action of spindle group II afferents (Matthews, 1984a) additionally excited with this stimulus, are depressed in many spastic patients is consistent with reduced group II effects. Observed abnormalities of stretch reflex behaviour did not readily explain the severity of accompanying spasticity of individual patients.

Received November 26, 1985. Revised May 13, 1986. Accepted June 3, 1986.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
I. O. Sorinola, C. M. White, D. N. Rushton, and D. J. Newham
Electromyographic Response to Manual Passive Stretch of the Hemiplegic Wrist: Accuracy, Reliability, and Correlation With Clinical Spasticity Assessment and Function
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, March 1, 2009; 23(3): 287 - 294.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. M. Mirbagheri, K. Settle, R. Harvey, and W. Z. Rymer
Neuromuscular Abnormalities Associated With Spasticity of Upper Extremity Muscles in Hemiparetic Stroke
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 629 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.