Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by NG, A.
Right arrow Articles by AL-SHEHAB, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by NG, A.
Right arrow Articles by AL-SHEHAB, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 110, No. 4, 1015-1031, 1987
© 1987 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

HYPEREXCITABILITY OF CUTANEOUS AFFERENTS DURING THE SUPERNORMAL PERIOD

RELEVANCE TO PARAESTHESIAE

ALFRED NG, DAVID BURKE and AHMAD AL-SHEHAB

Unit of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, The Prince Henry Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr David Burke, Department of Neurology, The Prince Henry Hospital, Little Bay, NSW 2036, Australia.

The excitability of cutaneous afferents in the median nerve of 20 normal human subjects was investigated using a supramaximal conditioning stimulus and a submaximal test stimulus that produced an afferent volley of 20 to 40% of maximum. The intensity of the test stimuli was 1.1 to 1.25 times threshold for the first recruited axons (defined as a compound action potential of approximately 0.5µV). The amplitude of the test volley did not reach the control amplitude until conditioning-test intervals of 3.4 ms. This was followed by a period of increased axonal excitability which reached a peak at intervals of 5 to 8 ms and declined gradually into a late phase of subnormality at 15 to 20 ms. The amplitude of the submaximal test potential was potentiated by, on average, 47% (range 9–146%) during the supernormal period. There were no significant changes in latency. The time course and the degree of potentiation were reproducible in the same subject on separate occasions. When the limb was cooled, the latency of the onset of supernormality was increased and the degree of supernormality was decreased and ultimately abolished. There was an inverse relationship between the degree of potentiation and the size of the test volley. High-frequency repetitive stimulation of the digital nerves for 10 min modified axonal excitability and produced spontaneous paraesthesiae that lasted for 20 min after the stimulation. Following this prolonged stimulus train, single submaximal stimuli evoked larger cutaneous afferent potentials than before the train, and the extent of the potentiation during the supernormal period was increased. It is concluded that prolonged repetitive stimulation of cutaneous afferents has two effects, one on axonal threshold, the second on the supernormal period. It is suggested that, in this experimental model, paraesthesiae result from ectopic impulses generated when axonal excitability is highest, namely at the peak of the supernormal period.

Received April 29, 1986. Revised September 11, 1986. Accepted October 28, 1986.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. H L Chan, C. S-Y Lin, E. Pierrot-Deseilligny, and D. Burke
Excitability changes in human peripheral nerve axons in a paradigm mimicking paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation
J. Physiol., August 1, 2002; 542(3): 951 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. Burke, K. Bartley, I. J. Woodforth, A. Yakoubi, and J. P. H. Stephen
The effects of a volatile anaesthetic on the excitability of human corticospinal axons
Brain, May 1, 2000; 123(5): 992 - 1000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.