Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCCARTHY, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by WARRINGTON, E. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MCCARTHY, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by WARRINGTON, E. K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 110, No. 6, 1545-1563, 1987
© 1987 Guarantors of Brain

research-article

THE DOUBLE DISSOCIATION OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY FOR LISTS AND SENTENCES

EVIDENCE FROM APHASIA

ROSALEEN A. MCCARTHY and ELIZABETH K. WARRINGTON

National Hospital for Nervous Diseases Queen Square, London

Correspondence to: Dr Rosaleen A. McCarthy, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EB.

We document the sentence and list repetition skills of 3 aphasic patients. Cases 1 and 2 were classified as span-impaired conduction aphasics and Case 3 was classified as a span-preserved transcortical sensory aphasic. We found that repetition by the span-impaired cases was facilitated by increasing the ‘meaningfulness’ of lists, whereas this had no effect on the performance of the span-preserved case. The patients' ability to repeat sentences was contrasted with their ability to repeat three words contained in the sentences, and a double dissociation was obtained: the span-impaired cases were better at repeating sentences than in repeating three word lists whereas the span-preserved case showed the opposite pattern of difficulty. The repetition of sentences containing a known and unknown vocabulary was tested in the span-preserved case. His repetition of sentences containing words which he still knew was significantly better than his ability to repeat sentences containing a vocabulary of words which he had ‘forgotten’ as a consequence of his aphasia. The patients' ability to repeat complete, incomplete, and nonsense sentences was contrasted: overall the span-impaired patients were somewhat better at repeating complete sentences than incomplete sentences. Finally we examined the patients' ability both to comprehend and repeat word strings in an abbreviated ‘naming from description’ task: the span-impaired patients were able to comprehend three word strings, but unable to repeat them, the span-preserved case was able to repeat but not comprehend. On the basis of these double dissociations we conclude that the evidence indicates two dissociable short-term memory systems, one a relatively passive phonological store subserving list repetition, the other a dynamic, anticipatory, and integrative memory system which underpins sentence repetition.

Received September 16, 1986. Revised February 17, 1987. Accepted March 10, 1987.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BrainHome page
J. D. Rohrer, W. D. Knight, J. E. Warren, N. C. Fox, M. N. Rossor, and J. D. Warren
Word-finding difficulty: a clinical analysis of the progressive aphasias
Brain, January 1, 2008; 131(1): 8 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.