Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (66)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER MECHÉ, F.G.A.
Right arrow Articles by KIEVIT, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by VAN DER MECHÉ, F.G.A.
Right arrow Articles by KIEVIT, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 111, No. 2, 405-416, 1988
© 1988 Oxford University Press


research-article

PATTERNS OF CONDUCTION FAILURE IN THE GUILLAIN-BARRE SYNDROME

F.G.A. VAN DER MECHÉ, J. MEULSTEE, M. VERMEULEN and A. KIEVIT

From the Department of Neurology, University Hospital Dijkzigt, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr F. G. A. van der Meché, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Dijkzigt. 40 Dr. Molewaterplein, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands

Within the limits of the Guillain-Barré syndrome, the pattern of clinical deficit is variable. Motor deficit may begin proximally or distally in the extremities and sensory deficit is sometimes, but not always present. Longitudinal studies were performed in 13 patients, starting during the progressive phase. The severity of the clinical deficit was related to the amplitude of the compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) and sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs). Two patterns were detected, but could only be reliably distinguished during the progressive phase of the disease. (I) A length- dependent reduction of the CMAP, i.e., a progressive decrease of the CMAP on moving the stimulating electrode to more proximal stimulation sites. This could often be attributed to conduction block. In this pattern (Group A), the sensory potentials were spared with only I exception. These patients had motor involvement without sensory deficit and the myotatic reflexes could be preserved up to MRC grade 3 paresis. (2) A simple reduction of the CMAP, i.e., the amplitude decreased during clinical deterioration, but during a single investigation remained similar for stimulation at all levels of the nerve. In this pattern (Group B), motor and sensory fibres were similarly involved. These patients showed both motor and sensory deficit and early myotatic areflexia. The second pattern might be explained by an immunological mechanism with a predilection for those regions of the peripheral nervous system where the blood-nerve barrier is naturally deficient. In the first pattern the discrepancy between the involvement of motor and sensory fibres raises new questions, the solution of which might be of importance for the understanding of the Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Received March 10, 1987. Revised May 26, 1987. Accepted July 23, 1987.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. Kaida, M. Sonoo, G. Ogawa, K. Kamakura, M. Ueda-Sada, M. Arita, K. Motoyoshi, and S. Kusunoki
GM1/GalNAc-GD1a complex: A target for pure motor Guillain-Barre syndrome
Neurology, November 18, 2008; 71(21): 1683 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PNHome page
J. Pritchard
Author's response
Practical Neurology, December 1, 2006; 6(6): 397 - 397.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J-P Lefaucheur, N A Gregson, I Gray, F von Raison, M Bertocchi, and A Creange
A variant of multifocal motor neuropathy with acute, generalised presentation and persistent conduction blocks
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 2003; 74(11): 1555 - 1561.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Capasso, C. M. Caporale, F. Pomilio, P. Gandolfi, A. Lugaresi, and A. Uncini
Acute motor conduction block neuropathy Another Guillain-Barre syndrome variant
Neurology, September 9, 2003; 61(5): 617 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S Kuwabara, K Ogawara, S Misawa, M Mori, and T Hattori
Distribution patterns of demyelination correlate with clinical profiles in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2002; 72(1): 37 - 42.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S Kuwabara, M Mori, K Ogawara, T Hattori, and N Yuki
Indicators of rapid clinical recovery in Guillain-Barre syndrome
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, April 1, 2001; 70(4): 560 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S. Kuwabara, K. Ogawara, M. Koga, M. Mori, T. Hattori, and N. Yuki
Hyperreflexia in Guillain-Barre syndrome: relation with acute motor axonal neuropathy and anti-GM1 antibody
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, August 1, 1999; 67(2): 180 - 184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
A. H. Ropper, E. F. M. Wijdicks, and B. T. Shahani
Electrodiagnostic Abnormalities in 113 Consecutive Patients With Guillain-Barre Syndrome
Arch Neurol, August 1, 1990; 47(8): 881 - 887.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.