Brain, Vol. 113, No. 1, 237-276, 1990
© 1990 Oxford University Press
research-article |
CEREBRAL CONTROL OF DIRECTED VISUAL ATTENTION AND ORIENTING SACCADES
1Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital Detroit, Michigan 2Psychology Service, Veterans' Administration Medical Center and the Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Correspondence to:
Correspondence to: Dr Sandra Nagel-Leiby, Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
The object of this experiment was to identify the contribution of the frontal and parietal lobes to the control of visual attention and volutary saccades. A symbolic spatial cue (arrow) was used to indicate validly or invalidly the location of a visual target located to the left or right of the cue. Manual reaction time and reaction time to initiate a saccade to the target were measured. Patients with damage to the left frontal lobe (n = 6), right frontal lobe (n = 7) and right parietal lobe (n = 7) were compared with normal control subjects (n = 20). A sex difference was found for the right cerebral hemisphere patients in the manual reaction time data. Right parietal males and right frontal females showed an overall elevation in manual reaction time, reflecting an inability to maintain a normal level of visual arousal and/or motor activation. Conversely, right frontal males and right parietal females were not influenced significantly by cue validity, suggesting that they were unable to direct visual attention in a covert manner. All subjects showed a normal effect of cue validity on saccade reaction time. Thus the cortical areas studied do not appear to be necessary for directing visual attention with a saccade. Cue validity, however, affected saccade amplitude, especially in the left visual field of patients with right hemisphere damage. The cue validity effect depended both on the sex of the subject and the anterior/posterior location of damage in the right hemisphere. Damage to the right frontal lobe resulted in an ‘under’ reaction to the spatial cues, especially in the male patients. Saccades were smaller than normal following the valid cues, but larger than normal following the invalid cues. The effect was opposite following damage to the right parietal lobe. In this case, saccade amplitude reflected an ‘over’ reaction to the spatial cues, especially in the female patients. Saccades were larger than normal following valid cues and smaller than normal following invalid cues.
Received August 11, 1987. Revised February 21, 1989. Accepted March 13, 1989.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Battaglia-Mayer, M. Mascaro, E. Brunamonti, and R. Caminiti The Over-representation of Contralateral Space in Parietal Cortex: A Positive Image of Directional Motor Components of Neglect? Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 514 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. J. Leigh and C. Kennard Using saccades as a research tool in the clinical neurosciences Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 460 - 477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.-S. R. Li, P. Mazzoni, and R. A. Andersen Effect of Reversible Inactivation of Macaque Lateral Intraparietal Area on Visual and Memory Saccades J Neurophysiol, April 1, 1999; 81(4): 1827 - 1838. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|