Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GAUTHIER, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by VERCHER, J.-L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by GAUTHIER, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by VERCHER, J.-L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 113, No. 6, 1857-1871, 1990
© 1990 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

OCULAR MUSCLE PROPRIOCEPTION AND VISUAL LOCALIZATION OF TARGETS IN MAN

GABRIEL M. GAUTHIER, DANIELLE NOMMAY and JEAN-LOUIS VERCHER

Laboratoire de Contrôles Sensorimoteurs, Département de Psychophysiologie, Université de Provence Marseille, France

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr Gabriel M. Gauthier, Laboratoire de Controles Sensorimoteurs, UA CNRS 372, Universite de Provence, Avenue Escadrille-Normandie Niemen, 13397 Marseille cedex 13, France.

Passive deviation of one eye through 18°, 30° and 42°, achieved by force applied to a sucked-on contact lens, caused the direction of visual targets seen by the other eye to be misjudged in the direction of the passive movement by an amount roughly one-sixth of the angle of passive deviation. The result was the same when the perceived direction was indicated by hand, as when the instant at which a moving target seemed straight ahead was signalled. This result is interpreted by considering that muscular efferents were identical in normal and eye-deviated subjects. The main difference between the two target localization conditions results from the proprioceptor output of the deviated eye. Our data demonstrate that the assessment of the direction of a target seen by an eye that is free to move depends in part on information received by the brain from proprioceptors in the orbit (in our case the contralateral orbit). It would be surprising if the ipsilateral orbit did not contribute as much or more. We therefore consider that this constitutes clear evidence against the pure outflow theory of visual direction judgement (Helmholz, 1867), additional to that provided by the all-or-nothing situation of complete versus incomplete oculomotor paralysis.

Two models have previously been proposed to describe the function of the visual localization mechanism. Both assume that the necessary information is derived from the coding of the position of the eye in the orbit, either through a copy of the muscular activation or through eye musele proprioception. We propose an alternative model in which both afferent and efferent signals from all actively contracted or stretched muscles provide the necessary information to the CNS. The data gathered so far from normal subjects made strabismic with a suction lens, and from a fair proportion of strabismic patients, support our model describing the mechanism of localization of a single punctate target in darkness.

Received August 22, 1989. Revised November 29, 1989. Accepted January 2, 1990.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. Blumer, K. Z. Konakci, C. Pomikal, G. Wieczorek, J.-R. Lukas, and J. Streicher
Palisade Endings: Cholinergic Sensory Organs or Effector Organs?
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2009; 50(3): 1176 - 1186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl.Home page
T. Handa, K. Mukuno, T. Niida, H. Uozato, N. Shoji, H. Ishikawa, and K. Shimizu
Sensory Adaptation in Exophoria and Exotropia
Amer. Orthoptic Jrnl., January 1, 2009; 59(1): 84 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
K. Z. Konakci, J. Streicher, W. Hoetzenecker, I. Haberl, M. J. F. Blumer, G. Wieczorek, J. G. Meingassner, S. L. Paal, D. Holzinger, J.-R. Lukas, et al.
Palisade Endings in Extraocular Muscles of the Monkey are Immunoreactive for Choline Acetyltransferase and Vesicular Acetylcholine Transporter
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 4548 - 4554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. B. J. Smeets and I. T. C. Hooge
Nature of Variability in Saccades
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 12 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. R. Weir, M. Cleary, S. Parks, T. Barrie, H. M. Hammer, and J. Murdoch
Spatial Localization after Different Types of Retinal Detachment Surgery
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2001; 42(7): 1495 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. R. Weir, M. Cleary, S. Parks, and G. N. Dutton
Spatial Localization in Esotropia: Does Extraretinal Eye Position Information Change?
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2000; 41(12): 3782 - 3786.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Br J OphthalmolHome page
C. R WEIR, P. C KNOX, and G. N DUTTON
Does extraocular muscle proprioception influence oculomotor control?
Br J Ophthalmol, September 1, 2000; 84(9): 1071 - 1074.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. F. Lewis, B. M. Gaymard, and R. J. Tamargo
Efference Copy Provides the Eye Position Information Required for Visually Guided Reaching
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 1998; 80(3): 1605 - 1608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.