Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WALL, M.
Right arrow Articles by GEORGE, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WALL, M.
Right arrow Articles by GEORGE, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 114A, No. 1, 155-180, 1991
© 1991 Oxford University Press

IDIOPATHIC INTRACRANIAL HYPERTENSION

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF 50 PATIENTS

MICHAEL WALL1,2, and DONNA GEORGE2

1 Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tulane University School of Medicine New Orleans, USA 2 Departments of Ophthalmology, Tulane University School of Medicine New Orleans, USA

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr Michael Wall, Tulane University School of Medicine, Department of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1430 Tulane Avenue, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA

Management of patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) should be based on the presence and progression of visual loss. To characterize the clinical course of IIH more completely, we monitored the clinical status, especially visual function, in 50 consecutive newly-diagnosed patients over a period of 2 to 39 months (average follow-up 12.4 months). The mean age at onset of symptoms was 31 (range 11–58) yrs; 46 (92%) were women and 47 (94%) were obese (mean weight 90 kg). Common symptoms were headache (92%), transient visual obscurations (72%) and intracranial noises (60%); 13 of the patients (26%) initially had complaints of sustained visual loss. There was visual loss as determined by Goldmann perimetry in 96% and by automated perimetry in 92%. Contrast sensitivity testing was abnormal in 50% and Snellen acuity in 22%. Two patients (4%) became blind in both eyes. The Goldmann visual field grade improved in 60% of patients but visual function deteriorated in 5 (10%). Deterioration of visual field grade was significantly associated only with weight gain during the year before diagnosis. Visual loss in patients with IIH is common and is often reversible. Patients should be evaluated by perimetry using an appropriate strategy and contrast sensitivity testing, along with careful examination of the optic discs.

Received August 8, 1989. Revised December 19, 1989. Accepted January 24, 1990.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.