Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HARRINGTON, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by HAALAND, K. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by HARRINGTON, D. L.
Right arrow Articles by HAALAND, K. Y.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 114A, No. 1, 99-115, 1991
© 1991 Oxford University Press

SEQUENCING IN PARKINSON'S DISEASE

ABNORMALITIES IN PROGRAMMING AND CONTROLLING MOVEMENT

DEBORAH L. HARRINGTON1,2, and KATHLEEN YORK HAALAND1,2,3

1 Veterans Administration Medical Center and Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico Albuquerque, NM, USA 2 Department of Neurology, University of New Mexico Medical School Albuquerque, NM, USA 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico Medical School Albuquerque, NM, USA

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr D. L. Harrington, Psychology Service (116B), Veterans Administration Medical Center, 2100 Ridgecrest Drive SE, Albuquerque, NM 87108, USA

Central programming deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD) were studied in two reaction time (RT) experiments. In Experiment 1, PD patients and controls performed sequences of hand postures that varied in length, the number of different postures (repetitive vs heterogeneous), and the delay interval before movement. Before movement, the PD group planned repetitive movements like controls whereas for heterogeneous sequences RT increased less with sequence length for the PD group, implying less preprogramming. The interresponse time (IRT) data from repetitive sequences showed that the PD group had difficulty controlling movement such that IRTs were faster when sequences were longer, thus allowing more time to schedule the termination of the sequence during the course of movement. For heterogeneous sequences, the PD group made more errors and were slower than controls when changing hand postures, suggesting a deficit in switching between different responses. While RT decreased with a longer delay similarly for both groups, IRT1, continued to improve only for the PD group but similarly for both types of sequences, suggesting a deficit specific to programming the first response. In Experiment 2, subjects made decisions about the number of different hand postures contained within a sequence. PD patients' decision times improved more with a longer delay only for heterogeneous sequences, suggesting a problem in identifying the number of different hand postures. The results have implications for levels of motor dysfunction in PD which emphasize the influence of sequence length and complexity.

Received July 25, 1989. Revised November 10, 1989. Accepted January 11, 1990.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.