Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (94)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PASCUAL-LEONE, A.
Right arrow Articles by HALLETT, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PASCUAL-LEONE, A.
Right arrow Articles by HALLETT, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 115, No. 4, 1045-1059, 1992
© 1992 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

EFFECTS OF FOCAL TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION ON SIMPLE REACTION TIME TO ACOUSTIC, VISUAL AND SOMATOSENSORY STIMULI

ALVARO PASCUAL-LEONE, JOSEP VALLS-SOLÉ, ERIC M. WASSERMANN, JOAQUIM BRASIL-NETO, LEONARDO G. COHEN and MARK HALLETT

Human Cortical Physiology Unit, Human Motor Control Section, Medical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to: Correspondence to. Dr Mark Hallett, Building 10, Room 5N226, NINDS, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.

In a simple reaction time (RT) paradigm, magnetic stimulation of different intensities was delivered over different scalp positions and at variable delays before (negative) or after (positive) the go-signal. Magnetic stimulation shortened RT to different go-signals (auditory, visual and somatosensory stimuli) by approximately 30 ms when delivered over the motor cortex contralateral to the responding arm at intensities below motor threshold. This effect was maximal at a delay of approximately + 10 ms. A similar effect was found with suprathreshold stimulation to the ipsilateral motor cortex. Magnetic stimulation over other scalp areas did not affect RT regardless of the delay. No differences were found between the effects on elbow flexion and thumb abduction. The shortening of RT was not associated with changes in the timing development of premovement excitability increase in the motor cortex. We conclude that magnetic stimulation shortens RT by inducing an earlier initiation of this excitability increase

Received January 2, 1992. Accepted March 30, 1992.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
S. A. Coombes, C. Tandonnet, H. Fujiyama, C. M. Janelle, J. H. Cauraugh, and J. J. Summers
Emotion and motor preparation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of corticospinal motor tract excitability
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, December 1, 2009; 9(4): 380 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
W. J. Z\#8217;Graggen, A. B. Conforto, R. Wiest, L. Remonda, C. W. Hess, and A. Kaelin-Lang
Mapping of direction and muscle representation in the human primary motor cortex controlling thumb movements
J. Physiol., May 1, 2009; 587(9): 1977 - 1987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Bosco, M. Carrozzo, and F. Lacquaniti
Contributions of the Human Temporoparietal Junction and MT/V5+ to the Timing of Interception Revealed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
J. Neurosci., November 12, 2008; 28(46): 12071 - 12084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
E. A. Fridman, T. Hanakawa, M. Chung, F. Hummel, R. C. Leiguarda, and L. G. Cohen
Reorganization of the human ipsilesional premotor cortex after stroke
Brain, April 1, 2004; 127(4): 747 - 758.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. J. Moser, R. E. Jorge, F. Manes, S. Paradiso, M. L. Benjamin, and R. G. Robinson
Improved executive functioning following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Neurology, April 23, 2002; 58(8): 1288 - 1290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
C. D MacKinnon and J. C Rothwell
Time-varying changes in corticospinal excitability accompanying the triphasic EMG pattern in humans
J. Physiol., November 1, 2000; 528(3): 633 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. Leocani, L. G. Cohen, E. M. Wassermann, K. Ikoma, and M. Hallett
Human corticospinal excitability evaluated with transcranial magnetic stimulation during different reaction time paradigms
Brain, June 1, 2000; 123(6): 1161 - 1173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H. Topka, S. Mescheriakov, A. Boose, R. Kuntz, I. Hertrich, L. Seydel, J. Dichgans, and J. Rothwell
A cerebellar-like terminal and postural tremor induced in normal man by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Brain, August 1, 1999; 122(8): 1551 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.