Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WATERSON, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by GREALY, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WATERSON, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by GREALY, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 115, No. 5, 1343-1358, 1992
© 1992 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF EYE AND HEAD MOVEMENTS DURING SMOOTH PURSUIT IN PATIENTS WITH CEREBELLAR DISEASE

JOHN A. WATERSON, GRAHAM R. BARNES and MADELEINE A. GREALY

MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to. Dr G R Barnes, MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK

Eye and head movements were analysed during smooth pursuit in 16 patients with various forms of cerebellar disease Smooth pursuit gain was reduced across all frequencies and velocities of target motion for the patient group as a whole, during both sinusoidal and pseudo-random target motion. The graded breakdown in the pursuit response, as pseudo-random target motion became less predictable, was of a similar magnitude in patients and controls, implying that the predictive pursuit mechanisms were intact in these patients During head-free pursuit, when vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) suppression was necessary, performance was not significantly different from that observed during head-fixed pursuit in the patient group. This finding is similar to that noted in control subjects, and is consistent with the observation that the VOR gains associated with head movements in darkness were similar in the patient and control groups The deficits in pursuit and VOR suppression in patients with cerebellar disease therefore represent a decrease in gain in the closed-loop visual feedback pathways with apparent sparing of the predictive pathways.

Received October 18, 1991. Revised January 24, 1992. Accepted April 14, 1992.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. E. Roy and K. E. Cullen
Brain Stem Pursuit Pathways: Dissociating Visual, Vestibular, and Proprioceptive Inputs During Combined Eye-Head Gaze Tracking
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2003; 90(1): 271 - 290.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. S. Dubrovsky and K. E. Cullen
Gaze-, Eye-, and Head-Movement Dynamics During Closed- and Open-Loop Gaze Pursuit
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2002; 87(2): 859 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
N. Takeichi, K. Fukushima, H. Sasaki, I. Yabe, K. Tashiro, and Y. Inuyama
Dissociation of smooth pursuit and vestibulo-ocular reflex cancellation in SCA-6
Neurology, February 22, 2000; 54(4): 860 - 866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. Moschner, T. J. Crawford, W. Heide, P. Trillenberg, D. Kompf, and C. Kennard
Deficits of smooth pursuit initiation in patients with degenerative cerebellar lesions
Brain, November 1, 1999; 122(11): 2147 - 2158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.