Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FLEMINGER, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FLEMINGER, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 115, No. 5, 1459-1480, 1992
© 1992 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

CONTROL OF SIMULTANEOUS MOVEMENTS DISTINGUISHES DEPRESSIVE MOTOR RETARDATION FROM PARKINSON'S DISEASE AND NEUROLEPTIC PARKINSONISM

S. FLEMINGER

Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to Dr S Flenunger, Department of Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, UK

Patients with depressive motor retardation, neuroleptic induced parkinsonism or Parkinson's disease were tested on movement tasks requiring control of simultaneous movements This was in order to determine whether these three groups of patients, who all show slowing of movements, also share the distinctive impairment of simultaneous movement control that is observed in Parkinson's disease. Though all three patient groups showed equivalent slowing on the motor tasks that were studied, the patterns of impairment were different Only the patients with parkinsonism, either neuroleptic induced or from Parkinson's disease, showed additional slowing of a rapid ballistic elbow flexion movement when it was performed simultaneously with a rapid squeeze of the ipsilateral hand Only patients with parkinsonism showed a significant increase in dual task interference on a bimanual bead and tapper task, compared with controls. The bead and tapper interference in patients with depressive motor retardation was between that of controls and parkinsonism Having a bimanual skill had a large effect on the subjects' dual task interference on this task. The measures of dual task interference for the two tasks did not correlate with one another; difficulty running simultaneous motor programs does therefore not explain the interference that is observed when tapping is performed while the other hand simultaneously performs a dextrous motor task. Only patients with parkinsonism showed increased fatigue on the tapping task The patients with depressive motor retardation did have elevated scores on a clinical rating of parkinsonism Nevertheless there are clearly defined differences between the movement disorder observed in patients with depression, and that observed in parkinsonism. The patterns of impairments in patients with neuroleptic parkinsonism were very similar to those of Parkinson's disease

Received October 3, 1991. Revised March 18, 1992. Accepted April 15, 1992.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
L. C. Parr-Brownlie and B. I. Hyland
Bradykinesia Induced by Dopamine D2 Receptor Blockade Is Associated with Reduced Motor Cortex Activity in the Rat
J. Neurosci., June 15, 2005; 25(24): 5700 - 5709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Salenius, S. Avikainen, S. Kaakkola, R. Hari, and P. Brown
Defective cortical drive to muscle in Parkinson's disease and its improvement with levodopa
Brain, March 1, 2002; 125(3): 491 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. Rowe, K. E. Stephan, K. Friston, R. Frackowiak, A. Lees, and R. Passingham
Attention to action in Parkinson's disease: Impaired effective connectivity among frontal cortical regions
Brain, February 1, 2002; 125(2): 276 - 289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.