Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by RURXE, D.
Right arrow Articles by STEPHEN, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by RURXE, D.
Right arrow Articles by STEPHEN, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 115, No. 5, 1497-1508, 1992
© 1992 Guarantors of Brain

research-article

ANODAL AND CATHODAL STIMULATION OF THE UPPER-LIMB AREA OF THE HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX

DAVID RURXE, RICHARD HICKS1,3 and JOHN STEPHEN2

1Department of Clinical Neurophysiology Sydney, Australia 2Orthopedic Surgery, The Prince Henry and Prince of Wales Childern's Hospitals Sydney, Australia 3Prince of Wales Medical Research Research Institute, University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to: Correspondence to. Professor David Burke, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, The Prince Henry Hospital, Little Bay, NSW 2036, Australia.

In 18 neurologically normal subjects the corticofugal volleys evoked by anodal and cathodal electrical stimulation of the motor cortex were recorded using epidural electrodes at the high-thoracic and low-thoracic regions of the spinal cord during surgery for scoliosis. At and just above threshold, anodal and cathodal stimulation of the upper-limb area and motor cortex produced a D wave that propagated to the low-thoracic region. The stimulus intensity required to produce D waves was significantly lower with anodal stimulation. I waves were recorded at higher stimulus intensities than the D wave but not more readily with cathodal stimulation There was no significant difference in the extent to which stimulus intensity had to be increased above D-wave threshold to produce I waves with the two stimulus polarities, and the number of I waves was the same when the stimulus was increased by the same amount above D-wave threshold. After withdrawal of isoflurane, I waves could not be recorded when the stimulus intensity was below D-wave threshold with either stimulus polarity. Anodal stimulation over the upper-limb area remained more effective than cathodal stimulation in producing both D and I waves. These results indicate that, at threshold, regardless of anaesthesia, anodal and cathodal stimuli access upper-limb corticospinal neurons directly at a similar site, the anodal stimuli being more effective. In addition, the results suggest that some corticospinal neurons in the upper-limb area of motor cortex have projections to lumbar segments

Received December 17, 1991. Revised May 12, 1992. Accepted May 19, 1992.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.