Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (89)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MATTINGLEY, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by PHILLIPS, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MATTINGLEY, J. B.
Right arrow Articles by PHILLIPS, J. G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 115, No. 6, 1849-1874, 1992
© 1992 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

IMPAIRMENTS OF MOVEMENT INITIATION AND EXECUTION IN UNILATERAL NEGLECT

DIRECTIONAL HYPOKINESIA AND BRADYKINESIA

JASON B. MATTINGLEY, JOHN L. BRADSHAW and JAMES G. PHILLIPS

Department of psychology, Monash University Clayton, Victoria, Australia

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Jason B. Mattingley, Department of Psychology, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.

Patients with unilateral neglect may exhibit slowness in the initiation of contralesionally directed movements in peripersonal space (directional hypokinesia). The present study used a sequential movement task to characterize any such impairment in a group of 24 patients with right hemisphere lesions, 18 of whom had left neglect. A further five patients with left hemisphere lesions, one of whom had right neglect, were also tested. We measured movement initiation and execution times for leftward and rightward movements in either hemispace and across the body midline. Most left neglect patients, particularly those with lesions involving posterior cortex, showed directional hypokinesia. Left neglect patients with anterior and/or subcortical lesions also showed directional bradykinesia, i.e. a slowing in the execution phase of contralesionally directed movements. This impairment occurred regardless of the spatial location of the apparatus and was exacerbated as patients moved closer to their neglected side. The patient with right neglect showed directional hypokinesia but not directional bradykinesia. Right hemisphere and left hemisphere lesion patients without neglect performed in a manner comparable to controls, who did not exhibit directional hypokinesia or directional bradykinesia. These results suggest that directional hypokinesia or directional bradykinesia. These results suggest that directional hypokinesia is associated with both left hemisphere and right hemisphere damage, but only in the context of unilateral neglect. Moreover, the site of hemispheric lesion may determine the temporal characteristics of movement impairments in neglect. Damage to posterior cortex produces deficits in detecting contralesional targets and initiating movements toward them, while damage to anterior or subcortical structures may disrupt the internal representation of an intended trajectory.

Received June 3, 1992. Accepted July 18, 1992.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Rossit, P. Malhotra, K. Muir, I. Reeves, G. Duncan, K. Livingstone, H. Jackson, C. Hogg, P. Castle, G. Learmonth, et al.
No Neglect-Specific Deficits in Reaching Tasks
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2009; 19(11): 2616 - 2624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Battaglia-Mayer, M. Mascaro, and R. Caminiti
Temporal Evolution and Strength of Neural Activity in Parietal Cortex during Eye and Hand Movements
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1350 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Sapir, J. B. Kaplan, B. J. He, and M. Corbetta
Anatomical Correlates of Directional Hypokinesia in Patients with Hemispatial Neglect
J. Neurosci., April 11, 2007; 27(15): 4045 - 4051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Battaglia-Mayer, M. Mascaro, E. Brunamonti, and R. Caminiti
The Over-representation of Contralateral Space in Parietal Cortex: A Positive Image of Directional Motor Components of Neglect?
Cereb Cortex, May 1, 2005; 15(5): 514 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Farne, L J Buxbaum, M Ferraro, F Frassinetti, J Whyte, T Veramonti, V Angeli, H B Coslett, and E Ladavas
Patterns of spontaneous recovery of neglect and associated disorders in acute right brain-damaged patients
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2004; 75(10): 1401 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
P. Plummer, M. E Morris, and J. Dunai
Assessment of Unilateral Neglect
Physical Therapy, August 1, 2003; 83(8): 732 - 740.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
Y. E. Landau, J. G. Auerbach, V. Gross-Tsur, and R. S. Shalev
Speed of Performance of Children With Developmental Right Hemisphere Syndrome and With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
J Child Neurol, April 1, 2003; 18(4): 264 - 268.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
S Ishiai, Y Koyama, K Seki, and M Izawa
Line versus representational bisections in unilateral spatial neglect
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, December 1, 2000; 69(6): 745 - 750.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Husain, J. B. Mattingley, C. Rorden, C. Kennard, and J. Driver
Distinguishing sensory and motor biases in parietal and frontal neglect
Brain, August 1, 2000; 123(8): 1643 - 1659.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M. E Downing, J. G Phillips, J. L Bradshaw, K. S Vaddadi, and C. Pantelis
Cue dependent right hemineglect in schizophrenia: a kinematic analysis
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 1998; 65(4): 454 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.