Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (52)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Priori, A.
Right arrow Articles by Marsden, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Priori, A.
Right arrow Articles by Marsden, C. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 116, No. 2, 355-367, 1993
© 1993 Oxford University Press


research-article

Some saccadic eye movements can be delayed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebral cortex in man

A. Priori1, L. Bertolasi2, J. C. Rothwell, B. L. Day and C. D. Marsden

MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology London, UK 1Present address: Dr A. Priori, Dipartimento di Scienze Neurologiche, Universita' degli Studi di Roma ‘La Sapienza’, V.le dell'Universita' 30, 00185 Roma, Italy. 2Present address: Dr L. Bertolasi, Clinica Neurologica, Universita' degli Studi di Verona, V. delle Menegone, 37134 Verona, Italy.

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr J. C. Rothwell, MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK.

In 15 normal subjects we investigated the effect on visually guided saccadic eye movements of giving a single transcranial magnetic stimulus through a circular coil centred at the vertex. In the normal paradigm, subjects fixated a target which moved randomly to the left or right by 11°. The mean saccadic reaction time of 189 ms was increased by 40–50 ms if a magnetic stimulus was given in random trials some 60 ms prior to the expected onset time of control saccades. The duration and amplitude of the saccades was unchanged. The delay was smaller if the stimulus was given earlier in the reaction period, or if the coil was moved anterior or posterior to the vertex. Larger stimulus intensities produced longer delays. Three subjects were trained to produce express saccades (mean saccadic reaction times of 107–141 ms) in a ‘gap’ paradigm. The latency of these saccades, which are thought to be mediated by collicular mechanisms without involvement of the cortex, was not affected by magnetic stimulation. This suggests that magnetic stimulation delays normal visually guided saccades by an action on the cerebral cortex, rather than on the oculomotor centres of the brainstem. Five subjects made non-targeted saccades in darkness in response to an auditory stimulus. These saccades, like visually guided saccades, could be delayed by magnetic brain stimulation. We conclude that saccadic delay is produced by interference with cortical areas involved in the execution of saccades rather than by interfering with the perception of the visual or auditory ‘go’ stimulus. These probably include supplementary and frontal eye field and posterior parietal cortex. The fact that visually guided saccades emerged intact after the delay indicates that the instructions for amplitude and direction were stored separately from those involved in timing when the movement was to occur.

Received May 21, 1992. Revised August 28, 1992. Accepted September 28, 1992.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C.-H. Juan, N. G. Muggleton, O. J. L. Tzeng, D. L. Hung, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh
Segregation of Visual Selection and Saccades in Human Frontal Eye Fields
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2008; 18(10): 2410 - 2415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S.F.W. Neggers, W. Huijbers, C. M. Vrijlandt, B.N.S. Vlaskamp, D.J.L.G. Schutter, and J. L. Kenemans
TMS Pulses on the Frontal Eye Fields Break Coupling Between Visuospatial Attention and Eye Movements
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2007; 98(5): 2765 - 2778.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
E. J. Tehovnik and W. M. Slocum
What Delay Fields Tell Us About Striate Cortex
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 559 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. Gagnon, T. Paus, M.-H. Grosbras, G. B. Pike, and G. A. O'Driscoll
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Frontal Oculomotor Regions during Smooth Pursuit
J. Neurosci., January 11, 2006; 26(2): 458 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
O. Bjoertomt, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh
Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Brain, September 1, 2002; 125(9): 2012 - 2022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
F.M. Mottaghy, M. Gangitano, R. Sparing, B.J. Krause, and A. Pascual-Leone
Segregation of Areas Related to Visual Working Memory in the Prefrontal Cortex Revealed by rTMS
Cereb Cortex, April 1, 2002; 12(4): 369 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
Y. Terao, Y. Ugawa, H. Enomoto, T. Furubayashi, Y. Shiio, K. Machii, R. Hanajima, M. Nishikawa, N. K. Iwata, Y. Saito, et al.
Hemispheric Lateralization in the Cortical Motor Preparation for Human Vocalization
J. Neurosci., March 1, 2001; 21(5): 1600 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H. Topka, S. Mescheriakov, A. Boose, R. Kuntz, I. Hertrich, L. Seydel, J. Dichgans, and J. Rothwell
A cerebellar-like terminal and postural tremor induced in normal man by transcranial magnetic stimulation
Brain, August 1, 1999; 122(8): 1551 - 1562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
Y. Terao, H. Fukuda, Y. Ugawa, O. Hikosaka, R. Hanajima, T. Furubayashi, K. Sakai, S. Miyauchi, Y. Sasaki, and I. Kanazawa
Visualization of the Information Flow Through Human Oculomotor Cortical Regions by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 1998; 80(2): 936 - 946.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. D. Burman and C. J. Bruce
Suppression of Task-Related Saccades by Electrical Stimulation in the Primate's Frontal Eye Field
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1997; 77(5): 2252 - 2267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.