Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (59)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Plant, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Plant, G. T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 116, No. 6, 1303-1335, 1993
© 1993 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

Impaired visual motion perception in the contralateral hemifield following unilateral posterior cerebral lesions in humans

Gordon T. Plant1,4, Kenneth D. Laxer2, Nicholas M. Barbaro2, Jade S. Schiffman3 and Ken Nakayama1,*

1Smith Kettlewell Eye Research Institute USA 2Northern California Comprehensive Epilepsy Centre and the Department of Neuological Surgery, University of California USA 3Letterman Army Medical Centre, San Francisco USA 4National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr Gordon Plant, The National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, WCIN 3BG, UK.

Contrast thresholds for a number of tasks were measured in the contralateral and ipsilateral upper quadrants of the visual field (eccentricity = 10°) before and after an occipito-parietal surgical resection, in one patient, carried out for intractable epilepsy. Postoperatively the contrast thresholds for discriminating the speed of movement of drifting sine-wave gratings were elevated by greater than a log unit in the contralateral field with little or no change in the detection thresholds for the same stimuli. Contrast thresholds for opposite direction-of-motion (DOM) discrimination of a contrast modulated (CMod) grating (a ‘non-Fourier’ motion stimulus) were also elevated by about a log unit in the contralateral hemifield but thresholds for DOM discrimination of a sine-wave (luminance modulated, LMod) grating were unaffected. Contrast thresholds for orientation discrimination of stationary gratings (a non-motion task) were unaffected. This general pattern of results was found in two other patients following lateral occipital surgical resections. Eight other patients with occipito-temporal (two cases), parietal (three cases) and medial occipital lobe lesions (three cases) showed no difference between the two hemifields on any of the tasks. Comparison of the location of the lesions leads to the conclusion that damage to the lateral occipital gyri is responsible for the pattern of visual deficit observed. Damage to an extra-striate visual area concerned with motion perception (the human homologue of primate V5-MT) may have occurred. There has been no previous description of impairment of motion perception localized to a hemifield in humans. The characteristics of the residual motion perception in these cases is described further in the accompanying article [Plant and Nakayama (1993), Brain, 116, 1337-1353].

.

Received September 21, 1992. Revised August 16, 1993. Accepted September 14, 1993.


*Present address: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Hayashi, K. Miura, H. Tabata, and K. Kawano
Eye Movements in Response to Dichoptic Motion: Evidence for a Parallel-Hierarchical Structure of Visual Motion Processing in Primates
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 2008; 99(5): 2329 - 2346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
Y. Noguchi, Y. Kaneoke, R. Kakigi, H. C. Tanabe, and N. Sadato
Role of the Superior Temporal Region in Human Visual Motion Perception
Cereb Cortex, October 1, 2005; 15(10): 1592 - 1601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. O. Dumoulin, C. L. Baker Jr, R. F. Hess, and A. C. Evans
Cortical Specialization for Processing First- and Second-order Motion
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2003; 13(12): 1375 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosi.Home page
H. Silver, N. Shlomo, M. Schwartz, and S. Hocherman
Impaired Visuomotor Function in Schizophrenic Patients Compared With Control Subjects
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, February 1, 2002; 14(1): 72 - 76.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. M. Vaina, A. Cowey, R. T. Eskew Jr, M. LeMay, and T. Kemper
Regional cerebral correlates of global motion perception: Evidence from unilateral cerebral brain damage
Brain, February 1, 2001; 124(2): 310 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
P. Freitag, M.W. Greenlee, K. Wachter, Th.M. Ettlin, and E.W. Radue
fMRI Response During Visual Motion Stimulation in Patients with Late Whiplash Syndrome
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 31 - 37.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
Y. Chen, G. P. Palafox, K. Nakayama, D. L. Levy, S. Matthysse, and P. S. Holzman
Motion Perception in Schizophrenia
Arch Gen Psychiatry, February 1, 1999; 56(2): 149 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. T. Smith, M. W. Greenlee, K. D. Singh, F. M. Kraemer, and J. Hennig
The Processing of First- and Second-Order Motion in Human Visual Cortex Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
J. Neurosci., May 15, 1998; 18(10): 3816 - 3830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. W. Greenlee and A. T. Smith
Detection and Discrimination of First- and Second-Order Motion in Patients with Unilateral Brain Damage
J. Neurosci., January 15, 1997; 17(2): 804 - 818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.