Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Duckers, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gispen, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Duckers, H. J.
Right arrow Articles by Gispen, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 117, No. 2, 365-374, 1994
© 1994 Oxford University Press


research-article

Effective use of a neutrophic ACTH4–9 analogue in the treatment of a peripheral demyelinating syndrome (experimental allergic neuritis)

An intervention study

H. J. Duckers, J. Verhaagen, E. de Bruijn and W. H. Gispen

Department of Medical Pharmacology, Rudolf Magnus Institute, Medical Faculty, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: W. H. Gispen, Rudolf Magnus Institute, Universiteitsweg 100, 3584 CG Utrecht, The Netherlands

Demyelinating syndromes are an important group of nerve disorders for which no effective therapy exists and which are life threatening in a substantial proportion of the patients. In the present experiments we assessed the ameliorative effect of Org 2766, a degradation resistant ACTH4–9 analogue devoid of corticotrophic and melanotrophic action in experimental allergic neuritis (EAN), an animal model for a human demyelinating disease, the Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). In order to mimic the clinical situation, peptide treatment was initiated at the first appearance of neurological symptoms in each animal. The ACTH4–9 analogue treatment substantially suppressed the neurological symptoms in animals with EAN, as assessed by clinical scoring and resulted in a significant improvement of motor performance. Furthermore, histological examination of the sural nerve provided a morphological basis for the beneficial functional effect of peptide treatment: more myelinated fibres were present in EAN animals treated with the ACTH4–9 analogue in comparison with EAN animals treated with saline. Further analysis of the sural nerve indicated a complete preservation of the diameter distribution of myelinated fibres in sural nerves of peptide-treated animals. In contrast, saline-treated EAN animals exhibited a significant loss of small and intermediate size myelinated fibres in the sural nerves. This study provides first evidence for the amelioration of the functional and anatomical deficits in an animal model of the GBS syndrome by an interventive synthetic neurotrophic peptide treatment.

experimental allergic neuritis; Guillain-Barré syndrome; ACTH(4–9) analogue; demyelinating syndrome; neuroprotection

Received July 26, 1993. Revised October 11, 1993. Accepted November 30, 1993.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
D. A. Bechtold, X. Yue, R. M. Evans, M. Davies, N. A. Gregson, and K. J. Smith
Axonal protection in experimental autoimmune neuritis by the sodium channel blocking agent flecainide
Brain, January 1, 2005; 128(1): 18 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
R.A.C. Hughes, C.M. Gabriel, N.A. Gregson, and K.J. Smith
Treatment of inflammatory neuropathy
Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 1997; 3(2): 88 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.