Brain, Vol. 118, No. 1, 25-35, 1995
© 1995 Oxford University Press
research-article |
Visual processing in migraineurs
-Prelec1,31Unit for Neurovisual Disorders, Massaschusetts General Hospital Boston 2Department of Neurology, Massaschusetts General Hospital Boston 3Department of Psychology, Harvard University Cambridge, USA
Correspondence to:
S. H. Wray, Unit for Neurovisual Disorders, ACC 837, Massachusetts General Hospital, 15 Parkman Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA
Twelve migraine subjects with aura and 12 matched control subjects performed four computerized visual tasks. Because chronic electroencephalographic and regional cerebral blood flow abnormalities in posterior brain functions have been documented during interictal periods, migraine subjects were tested between migraine attacks. Two tasks, orientation detection and temporal order judgement, were devised to examine ‘low-level’ visual processes. The results were compared with results from two tasks, picture naming and word priming, that were devised to examine ‘high-level’ visual processes. Regarding the response time data across all four tasks, the migraine group was faster in the two low-level tasks. There were no differences in error rate in any of the four tasks. The migraineur's apparent response time advantage in the low-level tasks provides a psychophysical corroboration of their assumed oversensitivity to visual stimuli. The remaining two tasks, picture naming and word priming, which involve the use of previously stored information, do not distinguish migraineurs from matched control subjects. These results suggest that migraineurs are better in low-level visual processing, in that the signals to the primary visual cortex (Area VI) are processed more rapidly, but this hypersensitivity does not carry over to the subsequent processing stages (beyond VI to superior parietal and inferior temporal cortices), as evidenced by the absence of a response time advantage in the two higher-level vision tasks.
migraine; low-level visual processing
Received January 19, 1994. Revised August 22, 1994. Accepted September 29, 1994.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. M. McKendrick, D. R. Badcock, and M. Gurgone Vernier Acuity Is Normal in Migraine, whereas Global Form and Global Motion Perception Are Not. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2006; 47(7): 3213 - 3219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S.V. Elkind and A. I. Scher Migraine and cognitive function: Some reassuring news Neurology, February 22, 2005; 64(4): 590 - 591. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Gaist, L. Pedersen, C. Madsen, I. Tsiropoulos, S. Bak, S. Sindrup, M. McGue, B. K. Rasmussen, and K. Christensen Long-term effects of migraine on cognitive function: A population-based study of Danish twins Neurology, February 22, 2005; 64(4): 600 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Coppola, M. Vandenheede, L. Di Clemente, A. Ambrosini, A. Fumal, V. De Pasqua, and J. Schoenen Somatosensory evoked high-frequency oscillations reflecting thalamo-cortical activity are decreased in migraine patients between attacks Brain, January 1, 2005; 128(1): 98 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. E. Waldie, M. Hausmann, B. J. Milne, and R. Poulton Migraine and cognitive function: A life-course study Neurology, September 24, 2002; 59(6): 904 - 908. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Boska, K. M.A. Welch, P. B. Barker, J. A. Nelson, and L. Schultz Contrasts in cortical magnesium, phospholipid and energy metabolism between migraine syndromes Neurology, April 23, 2002; 58(8): 1227 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. M. McKendrick, G. A. Cioffi, and C. A. Johnson Short-Wavelength Sensitivity Deficits in Patients With Migraine Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2002; 120(2): 154 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. McKendrick, A. J. Vingrys, D. R. Badcock, and J. T. Heywood Visual Dysfunction between Migraine Events Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2001; 42(3): 626 - 633. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W.M. Mulleners, E.P. Chronicle, J.E. Palmer, P.J. Koehler, and J.W. Vredeveld Suppression of perception in migraine: Evidence for reduced inhibition in the visual cortex Neurology, January 23, 2001; 56(2): 178 - 183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Oelkers, K. Grosser, E. Lang, G. Geisslinger, G. Kobal, K. Brune, and J. Lotsch Visual evoked potentials in migraine patients: alterations depend on pattern spatial frequency Brain, June 1, 1999; 122(6): 1147 - 1155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|