Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (88)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beckers, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zeki, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beckers, G.
Right arrow Articles by Zeki, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 118, No. 1, 49-60, 1995
© 1995 Oxford University Press


research-article

The consequences of inactivating areas V1 and V5 on visual motion perception

G. Beckers and S. Zeki

Department of Anatomy, University College London UK

Correspondence to: G. Beckers and S. Zeki, Department of Anatomy, University College, Gower Street, London WCIE 6BT, UK

We studied the capacity of normal humans to discriminate the direction of motion of visual stimuli when areas VI or V5 were reversibly inactivated with transcranial magnetic stimulation. We found that (i) magnetic stimulation of V5 at intervals of –20 to +10 ms before or after the onset of visual stimulation was effective in abolishing motion perception—other delays were not; (ii) magnetic stimulation of VI abolished motion perception only marginally and at delays which were significantly different from those obtained with V5, the stimulation now being effective only at delays of 60–70 ms after the onset of visual stimulation. We conclude (i) that stimulation of V5 is a much more potent way of inducing akinetopsia (motion imperception) than stimulation of VI ; (ii) that perceptually effective visual motion signals reach V5 at or before 30 ms and reach VI at or before 60 ms— consequently, perceptually effective motion signals reach V5 before they reach VI ; (iii) that, given the time course of arrival of signals in VI and V5, it takes about 30–50 ms for signals from VI to reach V5. We conclude further that there are probably two components reaching V5 from the retina, a fast one which bypasses VI and a slow one which reaches it through VI.

area VI; area V5; visual motion perception; residual motion vision; akinetopsia; parallel visual input; transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Received August 22, 1994. Accepted September 29, 1994.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
D. J. McKeefry, A. Gouws, M. P. Burton, and A. B. Morland
The Noninvasive Dissection of the Human Visual Cortex: Using fMRI and TMS to Study the Organization of the Visual Brain
Neuroscientist, October 1, 2009; 15(5): 489 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Bosco, M. Carrozzo, and F. Lacquaniti
Contributions of the Human Temporoparietal Junction and MT/V5+ to the Timing of Interception Revealed by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
J. Neurosci., November 12, 2008; 28(46): 12071 - 12084.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Moutoussis and S. Zeki
Motion processing, directional selectivity, and conscious visual perception in the human brain
PNAS, October 21, 2008; 105(42): 16362 - 16367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. J. McKeefry, M. P. Burton, C. Vakrou, B. T. Barrett, and A. B. Morland
Induced Deficits in Speed Perception by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Human Cortical Areas V5/MT+ and V3A
J. Neurosci., July 2, 2008; 28(27): 6848 - 6857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. L. Prime, M. Vesia, and J. D. Crawford
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over Posterior Parietal Cortex Disrupts Transsaccadic Memory of Multiple Objects
J. Neurosci., July 2, 2008; 28(27): 6938 - 6949.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
R. Laycock, D. P. Crewther, P. B. Fitzgerald, and S. G. Crewther
Evidence for Fast Signals and Later Processing in Human V1/V2 and V5/MT+: A TMS Study of Motion Perception
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2007; 98(3): 1253 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
C. de Labra, C. Rivadulla, K. Grieve, J. Marino, N. Espinosa, and J. Cudeiro
Changes in Visual Responses in the Feline dLGN: Selective Thalamic Suppression Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of V1
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1376 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Vesia, J. A. Monteon, L. E. Sergio, and J. D. Crawford
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Memory-Guided Pointing During Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Human Parietal Cortex
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2006; 96(6): 3016 - 3027.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
S. Zeki
The Ferrier Lecture 1995 Behind the Seen: The functional specialization of the brain in space and time
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2005; 360(1458): 1145 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Tanaka, M. Honda, and N. Sadato
Modality-Specific Cognitive Function of Medial and Lateral Human Brodmann Area 6
J. Neurosci., January 12, 2005; 25(2): 496 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. M. Vaina, A. Cowey, R. T. Eskew Jr, M. LeMay, and T. Kemper
Regional cerebral correlates of global motion perception: Evidence from unilateral cerebral brain damage
Brain, February 1, 2001; 124(2): 310 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. C. Huk and D. J. Heeger
Task-Related Modulation of Visual Cortex
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2000; 83(6): 3525 - 3536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
G. Ganis, J. P. Keenan, S. M. Kosslyn, and A. Pascual-Leone
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Primary Motor Cortex Affects Mental Rotation
Cereb Cortex, February 1, 2000; 10(2): 175 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
D. J. Heeger, G. M. Boynton, J. B. Demb, E. Seidemann, and W. T. Newsome
Motion Opponency in Visual Cortex
J. Neurosci., August 15, 1999; 19(16): 7162 - 7174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
M. S. George, S. H. Lisanby, and H. A. Sackeim
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Applications in Neuropsychiatry
Arch Gen Psychiatry, April 1, 1999; 56(4): 300 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
J. B. Demb, G. M. Boynton, and D. J. Heeger
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Early Visual Pathways in Dyslexia
J. Neurosci., September 1, 1998; 18(17): 6939 - 6951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.