Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (63)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filippi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Comi, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Filippi, M.
Right arrow Articles by Comi, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 118, No. 6, 1593-1600, 1995
© 1995 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

Intra- and inter-observer agreement of brain MRI lesion volume measurements in multiple sclerosis

A comparison of techniques

M. Filippi1,, M. A. Horsfield3, S. Bressi1, V. Martinelli1, C. Baratti2, P. Reganati2, A. Campi2, D. H. Miller4 and G. Comi1

1Departments of Neurology, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, University of Milan Italy 2Departments of Neuroradiology, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, University of Milan Italy 3Department of Medical Physics, Royal Leicester Infirmary, University of Leicester London, UK 4NMR Research Group, Institute of Neurology London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr Massimo Filippi, Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, University of Milan, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy

The measurement of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis is increasingly being used to evaluate the natural history of the disease and to monitor the efficacy of treatments. If, as might occur in multicentre studies, lesion load is measured by several observers in different patients or by the same observer in serial scans, it would be necessary to utilize a technique which provides results with high inter- and intra-observer agreements. This study was performed to evaluate the intra- and inter-observer agreement of semi-automated lesion volume measurement using thresholding, and to compare them with those obtained using an arbitrary scoring system (ASS) and a quantitative manual tracing method (MTM). Brain MRIs were obtained for 20 clinically definite multiple sclerosis patients and were evaluated independently by three observers. The median intra- and inter-observer agreements were, respectively, 88.5% (range 69.0–96.8%) and 79.0% (range 73.3–98.3%) using the ASS, 95.0% (range 85.1–99.4%) and 93.4% (range 77.3–98.3%) for the MTM, 96.3% (range 94.2–98.9%) and 93.7% (range 83.8–98.3%) for the semi-automated technique. The intra- and inter-observer agreements for the semi-automated technique increased to 98.5% (range 96.3–99.8%) and 96.1% (range 90.5–98.6%) when a consensus in the choice of threshold for lesion segmentation was reached. The intra- and inter-observer agreements were significantly greater for the semi-automated method compared with both the arbitrary scoring and the MTMs. The intra-observer variability for the semi-automated technique was significantly lower (P < 0.0001) than the inter-observer variability obtained using the same technique. These data indicate that it is possible to obtain high intra- and inter-observer agreements using a semi-automatic thresholding technique to quantify lesion volumes in multiple sclerosis. The technique may prove useful in multicentre studies, in which a single observer is still preferable.

multiple sclerosis; brain MRI; intra- and inter-observer agreement; lesion volume measurements

Received January 3, 1995. Revised May 2, 1995. Accepted July 4, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
A. P. Leff, T. M. Schofield, J. T. Crinion, M. L. Seghier, A. Grogan, D. W. Green, and C. J. Price
The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke
Brain, November 5, 2009; (2009) awp273v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
F. Cotton, H. L. Weiner, F. A. Jolesz, and C. R.G. Guttmann
MRI contrast uptake in new lesions in relapsing-remitting MS followed at weekly intervals
Neurology, February 25, 2003; 60(4): 640 - 646.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Achiron and M. Faibel
Sandlike Appearance of Virchow-Robin Spaces in Early Multiple Sclerosis: A Novel Neuroradiologic Marker
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2002; 23(3): 376 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
P. D Molyneux, P. A Brex, C. Fogg, S. Lewis, C. Middleditch, F. Barkhof, M. P Sormani, M. Filippi, and D. H Miller
The precision of T1 hypointense lesion volume quantification in multiple sclerosis treatment trials: a multicenter study
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 2000; 6(4): 237 - 240.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
P. A. Caruana, M. B. Davies, S. J. M. Weatherby, R. Williams, N. Haq, D. H. Foster, and C. P. Hawkins
Correlation of MRI lesions with visual psychophysical deficit in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis
Brain, July 1, 2000; 123(7): 1471 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
Y. Miki, R. I. Grossman, J. K. Udupa, L. Wei, M. Polansky, L. J. Mannon, and D. L. Kolson
Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Longitudinal Analysis of MR Images-Lack of Correlation between Changes in T2 Lesion Volume and Clinical Findings
Radiology, November 1, 1999; 213(2): 395 - 399.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
B. N. Joe, M. B. Fukui, C. C. Meltzer, Q.-s. Huang, R. S. Day, P. J. Greer, and M. E. Bozik
Brain Tumor Volume Measurement: Comparison of Manual and Semiautomated Methods
Radiology, September 1, 1999; 212(3): 811 - 816.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
V L Stevenson and D H Miller
Magnetic resonance imaging in the monitoring of disease progression in multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, August 1, 1999; 5(4): 268 - 272.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
T. A. Yousry, K. Seelos, M. Mayer, R. Brüning, I. Uttner, M. Dichgans, S. Mammi, A. Straube, N. Mai, and M. Filippi
Characteristic MR Lesion Pattern and Correlation of T1 and T2 Lesion Volume with Neurologic and Neuropsychological Findings in Cerebral Autosomal Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL)
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 1999; 20(1): 91 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Francis, A. Achiron, Y. Barak, N. Gadoth, E. Melamed, A. Miller, I. Steiner, O. Abramsky, A. Achiron, U. Gabbay, et al.
Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in multiple sclerosis
Neurology, January 1, 1999; 52(1): 214 - 214.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
K. S. Cover, J. Petkau, D. K. B. Li, D. W. Paty, M. Filippi, M. P. Sormani, F. Barkhof, J. H. van Waesberghe, M. L. Gawne-Cain, D. H. Miller, et al.
Lesion load reproducibility and statistical sensitivity of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis
Neurology, January 1, 1999; 52(2): 433 - 433.
[Full Text]


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
M. Filippi, T. A Yousry, M. A Rocca, C. Pereira, H. Alkadhi, and G. Comi
The effect of cross-talk on MRI lesion numbers and volumes in multiple sclerosis using conventional and turbo spin-echo
Multiple Sclerosis, December 1, 1998; 4(6): 471 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P D Molyneux, P S Tofts, A Fletcher, B Gunn, P Robinson, H Gallagher, I F Moseley, G J Barker, and D H Miller
Precision and reliability for measurement of change in MRI lesion volume in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of two computer assisted techniques
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, July 1, 1998; 65(1): 42 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.