Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lekwuwa, G. U.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lekwuwa, G. U.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, G. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 119, No. 2, 491-505, 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press


research-article

Cerebral control of eye movements II. Timing of anticipatory eye movements, predictive pursuit and phase errors in focal cerebral lesions

G. U. Lekwuwa and G. R. Barnes

MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr G. R. Barnes, MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WCIN 3BG, UK

Smooth pursuit eye movements are known to be driven by a mixture of visual feedback and predictive strategies. Prediction in pursuit allows humans to track predictable stimuli with minimal phase lag. But in certain disease states and focal neurological lesions, normal phase relationships are lost and humans track with increased phase errors. Using a sinusoidal pursuit paradigm, we sorted patients into those with large phase errors and those without. Then, working on the premise that large phase errors may have resulted from lack of prediction, we compared predictive and non-predictive ocular pursuit in patients with large phase errors, patients with normal phase errors and control subjects. Subjects sat in darkness and pursued an intermittently illuminated target moving with constant velocity to the right or left. When the movements were in alternate directions and predictable, all the groups possessed the ability to preprogramme appropriate anticipatory eye movements before target onset, and to use this for predictive pursuit. The difference between patients with large phase errors and normal subjects was not an absolute lack or possession of predictive ability but a difference in the timing at which a preprogrammed motor behaviour was initiated or terminated. The timing variability was wide and formed a graded continuum, the control subjects initiating anticipatory pursuit earlier, and the patients with large phase errors initiating much later. In a second experiment, subjects pursued a predictable ramp stimulus presented at various fixed frequencies. We found that in patients where anticipatory pursuit seemed abolished at one frequency of target presentation, changing the frequency of presentation elicited an anticipatory response. Patients adjusted their pursuit latencies to match the temporal demands of target presentation. At target frequencies above 0.8 Hz, there was a significant positive correlation between latencies in ramp pursuit and phase lags in sinusoidal pursuit. None of our patients showed complete loss of prediction irrespective of how large the phase errors were. Even when severe time delays in the system made it impossible for a subject to initiate anticipatory pursuit before target onset, prediction could still be demonstrated by the significant velocity and timing advantage the subject had in the pursuit of a predictable target stimulus, or by the technique of unexpectedly blanking the target.

ocular pursuit; cerebral lesions; prediction; timing; phase

Received June 28, 1995. Revised October 17, 1995. Accepted November 10, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
M.R. Burke and G.R. Barnes
Brain and Behavior: A Task-Dependent Eye Movement Study
Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2008; 18(1): 126 - 135.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. T. Avila, L. E. Hong, A. Moates, K. A. Turano, and G. K. Thaker
Role of Anticipation in Schizophrenia-Related Pursuit Initiation Deficits
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2006; 95(2): 593 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J.-J. Orban de Xivry, S. J. Bennett, P. Lefevre, and G. R. Barnes
Evidence for Synergy Between Saccades and Smooth Pursuit During Transient Target Disappearance
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2006; 95(1): 418 - 427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. R. Barnes and G. D. Paige
Anticipatory VOR Suppression Induced by Visual and Nonvisual Stimuli in Humans
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2004; 92(3): 1501 - 1511.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. N. Kumar, Y. Han, S. Garbutt, and R. J. Leigh
Properties of Anticipatory Vergence Responses
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2002; 43(8): 2626 - 2632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
G U Lekwuwa, G R Barnes, C J S Collins, and P Limousin
Progressive bradykinesia and hypokinesia of ocular pursuit in Parkinson's disease
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 1999; 66(6): 746 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.