Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Warrington, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cipolotti, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Warrington, E. K.
Right arrow Articles by Cipolotti, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 119, No. 2, 611-625, 1996
© 1996 Oxford University Press


research-article

Word comprehension

The distinction between refractory and storage impairments

Elizabeth K. Warrington and Lisa Cipolotti

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Professor Elizabeth K. Warnington, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London WCIN 3BG, UK

We report a series of experiments in which we compare the residual word comprehension skills of patients with cortical degenerative conditions and those with an ‘access’ dysphasia. Using word-picture matching tasks it was shown that (i) the presentation rate (the response-stimulus interval) affected the word comprehension performance of the patients with an access dysphasia but not of the patients with degenerative conditions; (ii) the semantic relatedness of the stimulus arrays had a greater influence in the performance of the access dysphasic patients than with a degenerative condition; (iii) word frequency was a strong determinant of the performance of patients with degenerative conditions but not those with an access dysphasia; and (iv) response inconsistency was a characteristic of the patients with an access dysphasia, whereas this was not observed in those with a degenerative condition. These four effects clearly differentiate the word comprehension performance of these two types of patients. Thus, two types of word comprehension impairment have been identified. A unitary account of the pattern of performance in the access patients in terms of refractoriness has previously been proposed and it is reiterated here. Similarly, a unitary account of the patients with degenerative conditions in terms of storage deficit is advanced. It is speculated that these two types of deficit, refractoriness and storage, reflect two sources of damage to the stored representations underpinning a word, rather than a dichotomy between deficits affecting the procedures of accessing semantic representations and the stored representations themselves. The implications for neurological diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are discussed.

dysphasia; dementia; semantic memory; refractoriness/storage

Received June 15, 1995. Revised October 11, 1995. Accepted November 15, 1995.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
F. Corbett, E. Jefferies, S. Ehsan, and M. A. Lambon Ralph
Different impairments of semantic cognition in semantic dementia and semantic aphasia: evidence from the non-verbal domain
Brain, September 1, 2009; 132(9): 2593 - 2608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
F. Campanella, M. Mondani, M. Skrap, and T. Shallice
Semantic access dysphasia resulting from left temporal lobe tumours
Brain, January 1, 2009; 132(1): 87 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. D. Rohrer, W. D. Knight, J. E. Warren, N. C. Fox, M. N. Rossor, and J. D. Warren
Word-finding difficulty: a clinical analysis of the progressive aphasias
Brain, January 1, 2008; 131(1): 8 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
E. Jefferies and M. A. Lambon Ralph
Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison
Brain, August 1, 2006; 129(8): 2132 - 2147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. J. Crutch and E. K. Warrington
Abstract and concrete concepts have structurally different representational frameworks
Brain, March 1, 2005; 128(3): 615 - 627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. J. Crutch and E. K. Warrington
Spatial coding of semantic information: knowledge of country and city names depends on their geographical proximity
Brain, August 1, 2003; 126(8): 1821 - 1829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. J. Crutch and E. K. Warrington
Refractory dyslexia: Evidence of multiple task-specific phonological output stores
Brain, August 1, 2001; 124(8): 1533 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Musso, C. Weiller, S. Kiebel, S. P. Muller, P. Bulau, and M. Rijntjes
Training-induced brain plasticity in aphasia
Brain, September 1, 1999; 122(9): 1781 - 1790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.