Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Okazawa, H.
Right arrow Articles by Konishi, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 119, No. 4, 1297-1306, 1996
© 1996 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

Cochlear implant efficiency in pre- and postlingually deaf subjects

A study with H215O and PET

Hidehiko Okazawa1,, Yasushi Naito2, Yoshiharu Yonckura1,3, Norihiro Sadato3, Shigeru Hirano2, Sadahiko Nishizawa1, Yasuhiro Magata1, Koichi Ishizu1, Nagara Tamaki1, Iwao Honjo2 and Junji Konishi1

1Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan 2Departments of Otolaryngology, Kyoto University Kyoto, Japan 3Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Fukui Medical School Fukui, Japan

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Hidehiko Okazawa, MD, Cyclotron Unit, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute, 3801 University Street, Montreal Quebec, Canada H3A 2B4

We used 15O-labelled water in a PET study to test the efficiency of cochlear implants (Cls) in transmitting auditory information to the brain in 10 profoundly deaf subjects. Five were postlingually deaf, and five were prelingually deaf. All the subjects were right-handed. White noise and verbal stimuli, delivered through the CIs, were used for cortical activation. Similar tasks were performed by six right-handed hearing subjects as a control group. In the postlingually deaf subjects, verbal stimulation activated the transverse temporal gyri (primary auditory cortices) mainly on the side contralateral to the CI. The left posterior superior temporal gyrus (Wernicke's area), and the left inferior frontal gyrus (Broca's area) were also activated irrespective of stimulated side. The location of these activated foci was the same as that of the control group. White noise stimulation led to an increase of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) only in the primary auditory cortices of the postlingually deaf subjects, only on the side contralateral to the CI, and the intensity of activation was less than that obtained with verbal stimulation. In the prelingually deaf subjects, Wernicke's area and Broca's area were significantly activated by verbal stimulation, whereas there was no activation in the primary auditory cortices. White noise did not activate the primary auditory cortex in the prelingually subjects. These findings suggest that cortical representation of language is not dependent on early auditory experience, while processing in the primary auditory cortices is experience-dependent. The postlingually deaf subjects had a greater increase of rCBF in the Broca's and Wernicke's areas and better sentence comprehension than the prelingually deaf subjects, Which suggests a parallel relation between rCBF increase and the ability to recognize spoken language. H215O-PET with auditory stimulation is as effective means of objectively quantifying the response of auditory and association cortices after CIs in deaf subjects.

cochlear implant; PET; activation study; auditory cortex; language cortex

Received October 27, 1995. Revised March 13, 1996. Accepted April 15, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
M.-W. Suh, H.-J. Lee, J. S. Kim, C. K. Chung, and S.-H. Oh
Speech experience shapes the speechreading network and subsequent deafness facilitates it
Brain, October 1, 2009; 132(10): 2761 - 2771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
E. A. Kretzmer, N. E. Meltzer, C.-A. Haenggeli, and D. K. Ryugo
An Animal Model for Cochlear Implants
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, May 1, 2004; 130(5): 499 - 508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
A.-L. Giraud, E. Truy, R. S. J. Frackowiak, M.-C. Gregoire, J.-F. Pujol, and L. Collet
Differential recruitment of the speech processing system in healthy subjects and rehabilitated cochlear implant patients
Brain, July 1, 2000; 123(7): 1391 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.