Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wagner, W.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 119, No. 5, 1507-1521, 1996
© 1996 Guarantors of Brain

research-article

Scalp, earlobe and nasopharyngeal recordings of the median nerve somatosensory evoked P14 potential in coma and brain death

Detailed latency and amplitude analysis in 181 patients

Wolfgang Wagner

Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School, University of Mainz Mainz, Germany

Correspondence to: Dr Wolfgang Wagner, Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik, Fleischmannstraße 8, D-17487 Greifswald, Germany

Median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded in a total of 181 patients in coma and brain death. Special attention was paid to the derivation of P14 (the positive potential occurring ~14 ms after median nerve stimulation) with different electrode montages, using midfrontal scalp (Fz), linked earlobe (A1/2), median nasopharyngeal (Pgz) and non-cephalic reference (NC) electrodes. The P14 amplitude (and, to a lesser extent, latency) were invariably lower in brain death than in coma. The potential was preserved in coma in all patients, but lost in brain death in 9.8% in Fz—NC and Pgz—NC recordings, in 23.2% in Fz—A1/2, and in 100% in Fz—Pgz. Thus, Fz—Pgz was the derivation yielding the most reliable results with respect to the distinction between coma and brain death and is therefore recommended as a confirmatory test, when other diseases interrupting the lemniscal pathway (isolated brainstem death, high cervical transverse cord lesion and focal bilateral lemniscal lesion) are excluded. Theoretical considerations lead to the hypothesis of different (rostral and caudal) segments of the P14 generator dipole being recorded by the different electrode montages. It is assumed that Fz—Pgz picks up the most rostral part of P14 (rP14) that is invariably lost in brain death and preserved in coma.

evoked potentials; somatosensory; P14 far-field potential; nasopharyngeal electrodes; brain death; coma

Received October 18, 1995. Revised February 12, 1996. Accepted April 19, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M. Sonoo, Y. Tsai-Shozawa, M. Aoki, T. Nakatani, Y. Hatanaka, A. Mochizuki, M. Sawada, K. Kobayashi, and T. Shimizu
N18 in median somatosensory evoked potentials: a new indicator of medullary function useful for the diagnosis of brain death
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 1999; 67(3): 374 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.