Brain, Vol. 119, No. 5, 1523-1534, 1996
© 1996 Guarantors of Brain
research-article |
The Perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders
MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Adolfo Bronstein, MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, 8-11 Queen Square, London WCIN 3BG, UK
The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical, SPV) was assessed in normal subjects and in patients with peripheral and central vestibular lesions and the data were compared with conventional neuro-otological assessments. Subjects were seated with eyes closed in a motorized gimbal which executed cycles of tilt at low constant speed (1.5° s1), both in the frontal (roll) and sagittal (pitch) planes. Subjects indicated with a joystick when they entered and left verticality, thus defining a sector of subjective uprightness in each plane. The mean angle of tilt (identifying a bias of the SPV) and the width of the sector (defining sensitivity of the SPV) were then determined. In normal subjects, the angle of the verticality sector was 5.9° for pitch and roll. Patients with bilateral absence of vestibular function, patients with vertigo, i.e. acute unilateral lesions, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and Ménière's disease, and patients with positionally modulated up-/ downbeat nystagmus all had enlarged sectors (i.e. loss in sensitivity). Mean sector angle in these groups ranged from 7.8 to 11° and the abnormality was present both in pitch and roll, regardless of the direction of nystagmus or body sway. Patients with chronic unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions and those with position-independent vertical nystagmus had normal sensitivities. No significant bias of the SPV was found in any patient group, not even those with acute unilateral vestibular lesions who had marked tilts of the subjective visual vertical (SVV). Complementary experiments in normal subjects tested under galvanic vestibular or roll-plane optokinetic stimulation also failed to show biases of the SPV. In contrast, a significant bias in the SPV could be induced in normal subjects by asymmetric cycles of gimbals tilt, presumably by proprioceptive adaptation. The following conclusions can be drawn. (i) The perception of body verticality whilst seated is mainly dependent on proprioceptive/contact cues but these are susceptible to tilt-mediated adaptation. (ii) Vestibular input improves the sensitivity of the SPV, even in vestibular disorders, as long as the abnormality is stable. (iii) There can be marked dissociation between vestibulo-motor (ocular and postural) phenomena and the perception of body verticality, and between the SPV and SVV. (iv) The postural sway asymmetries in patients with peripheral and central vestibular lesions, like those induced by galvanic or optokinetic stimulation in normal subjects, are not consequences of changes of the SPV.
spatial orientation; vestibular disorders; proprioception; visual vertical; postural vertical
Received February 2, 1996. Revised May 9, 1996. Accepted June 13, 1996.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. A. Tarnutzer, C. Bockisch, D. Straumann, and I. Olasagasti Gravity Dependence of Subjective Visual Vertical Variability J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1657 - 1671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. B Horak, D. M Wrisley, and J. Frank The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits Physical Therapy, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 484 - 498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Perennou, G. Mazibrada, V. Chauvineau, R. Greenwood, J. Rothwell, M. A. Gresty, and A. M. Bronstein Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisphere stroke: a causal relationship? Brain, September 1, 2008; 131(9): 2401 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Baier, S. Bense, and M. Dieterich Are signs of ocular tilt reaction in patients with cerebellar lesions mediated by the dentate nucleus? Brain, June 1, 2008; 131(6): 1445 - 1454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. De Vrijer, W. P. Medendorp, and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen Shared Computational Mechanism for Tilt Compensation Accounts for Biased Verticality Percepts in Motion and Pattern Vision J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 915 - 930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Saj, J. Honore, J. Davroux, Y. Coello, and M. Rousseaux Effect of Posture on the Perception of Verticality in Neglect Patients Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2203 - 2205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, L. Johannsen, D. Broetz, and W. Kuker Posterior thalamic hemorrhage induces "pusher syndrome" Neurology, March 22, 2005; 64(6): 1014 - 1019. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Saj, J. Honore, T. Bernati, Y. Coello, and M. Rousseaux Subjective Visual Vertical in Pitch and Roll in Right Hemispheric Stroke Stroke, March 1, 2005; 36(3): 588 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath and D. Broetz Understanding and Treating "Pusher Syndrome" Physical Therapy, December 1, 2003; 83(12): 1119 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Bronstein, D. A. Perennou, M. Guerraz, D. Playford, and P. Rudge Dissociation of visual and haptic vertical in two patients with vestibular nuclear lesions Neurology, November 11, 2003; 61(9): 1260 - 1262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L Wardman, J. L Taylor, and R. C Fitzpatrick Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on human posture and perception while standing J. Physiol., September 15, 2003; 551(3): 1033 - 1042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-O. Karnath, S. Ferber, and J. Dichgans The origin of contraversive pushing: Evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans Neurology, November 14, 2000; 55(9): 1298 - 1304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Van Beuzekom and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen Properties of the Internal Representation of Gravity Inferred From Spatial-Direction and Body-Tilt Estimates J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 11 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Earthquake Prediction by Animals: Evolution and Sensory Perception Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 312 - 323. |
||||
![]() |
D Anastasopoulos and A M Bronstein A case of thalamic syndrome: somatosensory influences on visual orientation J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 1999; 67(3): 390 - 394. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
T. Okada, E. Grunfeld, J. Shallo-Hoffmann, and A. M. Bronstein Vestibular perception of angular velocity in normal subjects and in patients with congenital nystagmus Brain, July 1, 1999; 122(7): 1293 - 1303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||







