Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (64)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bisdorff, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gresty, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bisdorff, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gresty, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 119, No. 5, 1523-1534, 1996
© 1996 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

The Perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders

A. R. Bisdorff, C. J. Wolsley, D. Anastasopoulos, A. M. Bronstein and M. A. Gresty

MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery London, UK

Correspondence to: Dr Adolfo Bronstein, MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, 8-11 Queen Square, London WCIN 3BG, UK

The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical, SPV) was assessed in normal subjects and in patients with peripheral and central vestibular lesions and the data were compared with conventional neuro-otological assessments. Subjects were seated with eyes closed in a motorized gimbal which executed cycles of tilt at low constant speed (1.5° s–1), both in the frontal (roll) and sagittal (pitch) planes. Subjects indicated with a joystick when they entered and left verticality, thus defining a sector of subjective uprightness in each plane. The mean angle of tilt (identifying a bias of the SPV) and the width of the sector (defining sensitivity of the SPV) were then determined. In normal subjects, the angle of the ‘verticality’ sector was 5.9° for pitch and roll. Patients with bilateral absence of vestibular function, patients with vertigo, i.e. acute unilateral lesions, benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and Ménière's disease, and patients with positionally modulated up-/ downbeat nystagmus all had enlarged sectors (i.e. loss in sensitivity). Mean sector angle in these groups ranged from 7.8 to 11° and the abnormality was present both in pitch and roll, regardless of the direction of nystagmus or body sway. Patients with chronic unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions and those with position-independent vertical nystagmus had normal sensitivities. No significant bias of the SPV was found in any patient group, not even those with acute unilateral vestibular lesions who had marked tilts of the subjective visual vertical (SVV). Complementary experiments in normal subjects tested under galvanic vestibular or roll-plane optokinetic stimulation also failed to show biases of the SPV. In contrast, a significant bias in the SPV could be induced in normal subjects by asymmetric cycles of gimbals tilt, presumably by proprioceptive adaptation. The following conclusions can be drawn. (i) The perception of body verticality whilst seated is mainly dependent on proprioceptive/contact cues but these are susceptible to tilt-mediated adaptation. (ii) Vestibular input improves the sensitivity of the SPV, even in vestibular disorders, as long as the abnormality is stable. (iii) There can be marked dissociation between vestibulo-motor (ocular and postural) phenomena and the perception of body verticality, and between the SPV and SVV. (iv) The postural sway asymmetries in patients with peripheral and central vestibular lesions, like those induced by galvanic or optokinetic stimulation in normal subjects, are not consequences of changes of the SPV.

spatial orientation; vestibular disorders; proprioception; visual vertical; postural vertical

Received February 2, 1996. Revised May 9, 1996. Accepted June 13, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. A. Tarnutzer, C. Bockisch, D. Straumann, and I. Olasagasti
Gravity Dependence of Subjective Visual Vertical Variability
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1657 - 1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
F. B Horak, D. M Wrisley, and J. Frank
The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to Differentiate Balance Deficits
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 484 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. A. Perennou, G. Mazibrada, V. Chauvineau, R. Greenwood, J. Rothwell, M. A. Gresty, and A. M. Bronstein
Lateropulsion, pushing and verticality perception in hemisphere stroke: a causal relationship?
Brain, September 1, 2008; 131(9): 2401 - 2413.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
B. Baier, S. Bense, and M. Dieterich
Are signs of ocular tilt reaction in patients with cerebellar lesions mediated by the dentate nucleus?
Brain, June 1, 2008; 131(6): 1445 - 1454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. De Vrijer, W. P. Medendorp, and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen
Shared Computational Mechanism for Tilt Compensation Accounts for Biased Verticality Percepts in Motion and Pattern Vision
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2008; 99(2): 915 - 930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Saj, J. Honore, J. Davroux, Y. Coello, and M. Rousseaux
Effect of Posture on the Perception of Verticality in Neglect Patients
Stroke, October 1, 2005; 36(10): 2203 - 2205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
H.-O. Karnath, L. Johannsen, D. Broetz, and W. Kuker
Posterior thalamic hemorrhage induces "pusher syndrome"
Neurology, March 22, 2005; 64(6): 1014 - 1019.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
A. Saj, J. Honore, T. Bernati, Y. Coello, and M. Rousseaux
Subjective Visual Vertical in Pitch and Roll in Right Hemispheric Stroke
Stroke, March 1, 2005; 36(3): 588 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
H.-O. Karnath and D. Broetz
Understanding and Treating "Pusher Syndrome"
Physical Therapy, December 1, 2003; 83(12): 1119 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
A. M. Bronstein, D. A. Perennou, M. Guerraz, D. Playford, and P. Rudge
Dissociation of visual and haptic vertical in two patients with vestibular nuclear lesions
Neurology, November 11, 2003; 61(9): 1260 - 1262.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
D. L Wardman, J. L Taylor, and R. C Fitzpatrick
Effects of galvanic vestibular stimulation on human posture and perception while standing
J. Physiol., September 15, 2003; 551(3): 1033 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
H.-O. Karnath, S. Ferber, and J. Dichgans
The origin of contraversive pushing: Evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans
Neurology, November 14, 2000; 55(9): 1298 - 1304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. D. Van Beuzekom and J.A.M. Van Gisbergen
Properties of the Internal Representation of Gravity Inferred From Spatial-Direction and Body-Tilt Estimates
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2000; 84(1): 11 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of AmericaHome page
Earthquake Prediction by Animals: Evolution and Sensory Perception
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, April 1, 2000; 90(2): 312 - 323.



Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
D Anastasopoulos and A M Bronstein
A case of thalamic syndrome: somatosensory influences on visual orientation
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 1999; 67(3): 390 - 394.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BrainHome page
T. Okada, E. Grunfeld, J. Shallo-Hoffmann, and A. M. Bronstein
Vestibular perception of angular velocity in normal subjects and in patients with congenital nystagmus
Brain, July 1, 1999; 122(7): 1293 - 1303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.