Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ffytche, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Zeki, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ffytche, D. H.
Right arrow Articles by Zeki, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 119, No. 6, 1971-1982, 1996
© 1996 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

Motion specific responses from a blind hemifield

D. H. ffytche1,, C. N. Guy2 and S. Zeki1

1Wellcome Trust Laboratory of Neurobiology, University College London London, UK 2Blackett Laboratory, Physics Department, Imperial College London, UK

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: D. H. ffytche, Wellcome Trust Laboratory of Neurobiology, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

In a previous study we showed that fast moving stimuli activate V5, an area specialized for motion, at very short latencies through a pathway that reaches it without passing through VI. Using the same technique of visual evoked responses, we have tested our conclusions by studying patient GY, whose VI is damaged but whose V5 is intact. In spite of the contralateral hemi-blindness due to his VI lesion, GY has a residual visual capacity that allows him to perceive, consciously, fast but not slow moving stimuli presented in his affected hemifield. By stimulating GY's ‘blind’ hemifield and comparing the responses with those obtained from normal subjects, we were able to study the relative contribution of VI and V5 to the visual evoked response to motion in normal subjects. We found that GY's early response to fast motion is preserved and correlates with activity elicited in control subjects over area V5, while slow motion, pattern offset, and pattern reversal stimuli failed to elicit responses in GY. The results confirm our previous conclusions: namely, that the early part of the motion evoked response is generated in area V5 and that signals reach this area through a dynamically parallel pathway that bypasses area V1. They go on to demonstrate that neurophysiological activity in the prestriate cortex correlates with the conscious visual perception of motion.

motion evoked response; residual vision; VI; V5; dynamic parallelism

Received April 22, 1996. Accepted August 5, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
S. Zeki
The Ferrier Lecture 1995 Behind the Seen: The functional specialization of the brain in space and time
Phil Trans R Soc B, June 29, 2005; 360(1458): 1145 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
D H ffytche, J M Lappin, and M Philpot
Visual command hallucinations in a patient with pure alexia
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2004; 75(1): 80 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Catani, D. K. Jones, R. Donato, and D. H. ffytche
Occipito-temporal connections in the human brain
Brain, September 1, 2003; 126(9): 2093 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. E. Collins, D. C. Lyon, and J. H. Kaas
Responses of Neurons in the Middle Temporal Visual Area After Long-Standing Lesions of the Primary Visual Cortex in Adult New World Monkeys
J. Neurosci., March 15, 2003; 23(6): 2251 - 2264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
P. Azzopardi and A. Cowey
Motion discrimination in cortically blind patients
Brain, January 1, 2001; 124(1): 30 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. Ogino and K. Ohtsuka
Effects of Superior Colliculus Inhibition on Visual Motion Processing in the Lateral Suprasylvian Visual Area of the Cat
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2000; 41(3): 955 - 960.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
H. A. Baseler, A. B. Morland, and B. A. Wandell
Topographic Organization of Human Visual Areas in the Absence of Input from Primary Cortex
J. Neurosci., April 1, 1999; 19(7): 2619 - 2627.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
S. Zeki
{blacksquare} REVIEW : Parallel Processing, Asynchronous Perception, and a Distributed System of Consciousness in Vision
Neuroscientist, September 1, 1998; 4(5): 365 - 372.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
T. Brandt, S. F. Bucher, K. C. Seelos, and M. Dieterich
Bilateral Functional MRI Activation of the Basal Ganglia and Middle Temporal/Medial Superior Temporal Motion-Sensitive Areas: Optokinetic Stimulation in Homonymous Hemianopia
Arch Neurol, August 1, 1998; 55(8): 1126 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.