Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by O'Brien, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Cook, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 119, No. 6, 2133-2141, 1996
© 1996 Guarantors of Brain


research-article

Temporal lobe epilepsy caused by mesial temporal sclerosis and temporal neocortical lesions

A clinical and electroencephalographic study of 46 pathologically proven cases

Terence J. O'Brien1,2, Christine Kilpatrick1, Vanessa Murrie3, Simon Vogrin2, Kevin Morris3 and Mark J. Cook1,2,3,

1Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne, Australia 2St.vincent's hospital Melbourne, Australia 3Australian computing and communication institute Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to: Correspondence to: Dr Mark J. Cook, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, St Vincent's Hospital, Victoria Parade, Fitzroy, 3065 Victoria, Australia

This study aims to determine whether there are important clinico-electrical differences between patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) secondary to mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) and those with TLE secondary to a discrete temporal neocortical lesion (NL). The case histories, interictal EEG, seizure semiology, ictal EEG and postoperative outcome of 46 pathologically proven patients (31 MTS and 15 NL) were compared. A history of febrile convulsions (FC) was more common in MTS patients (58% versus 26%, P < 0.05), as was a history of a significant cerebral event at <4 years of age (22% versus 0%, P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence or nature of auras. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found in the interictal-EEG. With ictal semiology dystonic posturing occurred more frequently in MTS patients (mean 52% versus 26%, P < 0.05). Facial grimacing/ twitching occurred earlier in the seizures of NL patients (median 19 s versus 35 s, P < 0.05). There was an increased frequency of fast rhythmic sharp waves (>4 Hz) in the ictal-EEG of MTS patients (mean 81% versus 60%, P = 0.05). The patients with NL developed bilateral ictal EEG changes more often (mean 55% versus 26%, P < 0.05) and more rapidly (mean 23 s versus 74 s, P < 0.005). The onset of ictal EEG seizure activity was bilateral more often in patients with NL (20% versus 4%, P < 0.005). There were no significant differences between the two groups for any of the video-EEG features, in terms of whether or not the feature occurred at least once in an individual patient. There was a tendency for MTS patients to have a higher seizure-free post-surgical outcome (87% versus 60%, P = 0.057). However, all the NL patients who were not free of seizures had had an incomplete lesion resection. We conclude that there are a number of clinico-electrical differences between patients with mesial TLE (MTLE) and patients with neocortical TLE (NCTLE), but that none of these are sufficient to allow a distinction to be made in an individual patient.

temporal lobe epilepsy; mesial temporal sclerosis; neocortical foreign tissue lesions; mesial temporal lobe epilepsy; neocortical temporal lobe epilepsy

Received March 22, 1996. Revised June 19, 1996. Accepted June 24, 1996.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P P Quarato, G Di Gennaro, A Mascia, L G Grammaldo, G N Meldolesi, A Picardi, T Giampa, C Falco, F Sebastiano, P Onorati, et al.
Temporal lobe epilepsy surgery: different surgical strategies after a non-invasive diagnostic protocol
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2005; 76(6): 815 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. P. Carne, T. J. O'Brien, C. J. Kilpatrick, L. R. MacGregor, R. J. Hicks, M. A. Murphy, S. C. Bowden, A. H. Kaye, and M. J. Cook
MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome
Brain, October 1, 2004; 127(10): 2276 - 2285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
Y. K. Kim, D. S. Lee, S. K. Lee, S.-K. Kim, C. K. Chung, K. H. Chang, K. Y. Choi, J.-K. Chung, and M. C. Lee
Differential Features of Metabolic Abnormalities Between Medial and Lateral Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Quantitative Analysis of 18F-FDG PET Using SPM
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1006 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
T. J. O'Brien, H. Moses, D. Cambier, and G. D. Cascino
Age of meningitis or encephalitis is independently predictive of outcome from anterior temporal lobectomy
Neurology, January 8, 2002; 58(1): 104 - 109.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
N. Foldvary, G. Klem, J. Hammel, W. Bingaman, I. Najm, and H. Luders
The localizing value of ictal EEG in focal epilepsy
Neurology, December 11, 2001; 57(11): 2022 - 2028.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Janszky, P. Halasz, J. Vitrai, G. Rasonyi, P. Barsi, R. Kalviainen, T. Salmenpera, K. Partanen, P. Vainio, P. Riekkinen Sr., et al.
Hippocampal damage and the onset of epilepsy
Neurology, May 1, 1999; 52(8): 1717 - 1717.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.