Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Timmann, D.
Right arrow Articles by Horak, F. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Timmann, D.
Right arrow Articles by Horak, F. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 120, Issue 2 327-337, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Prediction and set-dependent scaling of early postural responses in cerebellar patients

D Timmann and FB Horak
R. S. Dow Neurological Sciences Institute, Portland, OR 97209, USA.

We reported previously that patients with cerebellar deficits were unable to scale the magnitude of their early automatic postural responses to the predicted amplitudes of surface translations based on central set from prior experience. The present study investigated whether this deficit in set-dependent amplitude scaling was based predominantly on the cerebellar patient's disability (i) to predict perturbation amplitudes on the basis of prior experience, (ii) to scale the gain or magnitude of upcoming postural responses or (iii) to habituate postural responses. The increase in size of the early postural response when a larger than actual platform amplitude was expected and decrease when a smaller one was expected was defined as a measure of set-dependent amplitude prediction. The suppression of the postural response when the same platform velocity was repeated was used as a measure of habituation. The correlation between the size of early postural responses and platform amplitudes when presented serially, but not randomly, tested the ability to scale the gain of postural responses based on prior experience. Results show that although cerebellar patients could predict perturbation amplitudes based on prior experience, they could not use this prediction to modify precisely the gain of responses. The ability to habituate the magnitude of postural responses was not affected by cerebellar lesions. Thus, the cerebellum might not be critical for predicting upcoming events or for habituating to repeated postural stimuli, although it is important for accurate tuning of response gain based on prediction.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. D. J. Welch and L. H. Ting
A Feedback Model Explains the Differential Scaling of Human Postural Responses to Perturbation Acceleration and Velocity
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2009; 101(6): 3294 - 3309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
K. Rabe, B. Brandauer, Y. Li, E. R. Gizewski, D. Timmann, and J. Hermsdorfer
Size-Weight Illusion, Anticipation, and Adaptation of Fingertip Forces in Patients With Cerebellar Degeneration
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 569 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Bhatt and Y. C. Pai
Generalization of Gait Adaptation for Fall Prevention: From Moveable Platform to Slippery Floor
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2009; 101(2): 948 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P.H.J.A. Nieuwenhuijzen and J. Duysens
Proactive and Reactive Mechanisms Play a Role in Stepping on Inverting Surfaces During Gait
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2007; 98(4): 2266 - 2273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Bhatt and Y.-C. Pai
Long-Term Retention of Gait Stability Improvements
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2005; 94(3): 1971 - 1979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Dimitrova, F. B. Horak, and J. G. Nutt
Postural Muscle Responses to Multidirectional Translations in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
J Neurophysiol, January 1, 2004; 91(1): 489 - 501.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. S. Marigold and A. E. Patla
Strategies for Dynamic Stability During Locomotion on a Slippery Surface: Effects of Prior Experience and Knowledge
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2002; 88(1): 339 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
D. Timmann, R. Citron, S. Watts, and J. Hore
Increased Variability in Finger Position Occurs Throughout Overarm Throws Made by Cerebellar and Unskilled Subjects
J Neurophysiol, December 1, 2001; 86(6): 2690 - 2702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
G. M. Earhart and A. J. Bastian
Selection and Coordination of Human Locomotor Forms Following Cerebellar Damage
J Neurophysiol, February 1, 2001; 85(2): 759 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
C. E. Lang and A. J. Bastian
Cerebellar Subjects Show Impaired Adaptation of Anticipatory EMG During Catching
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 1999; 82(5): 2108 - 2119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P Mummel, D Timmann, U W H Krause, D Boering, A F Thilmann, H C Diener, and F B Horak
Postural responses to changing task conditions in patients with cerebellar lesions
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, November 1, 1998; 65(5): 734 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. M. Henry, J. Fung, and F. B. Horak
EMG Responses to Maintain Stance During Multidirectional Surface Translations
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 1998; 80(4): 1939 - 1950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.