Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mazzocchio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mazzocchio, R.
Right arrow Articles by Rossi, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 120, Issue 6 991-1003, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Involvement of spinal recurrent inhibition in spasticity. Further insight into the regulation of Renshaw cell activity

R Mazzocchio and A Rossi
Unita di Malattie del Sistema Motorio e Scienze del Movimento, Universita di Siena, Italy.

Changes in the excitability of the soleus H-reflex are were studied after oral administration of L-acetylcarnitine, a cholinomimetic substance, in eight healthy control subjects and 23 spastic patients presenting with slowly progressive paraparesis (n = 10), a cord lesion (n = 9) and a cerebral lesion (n = 4). Changes in the amount of recurrent inhibition of soleus motor neurons at rest were also estimated in order to assess the level of activity of Renshaw cells before and after L-acetylcarnitine administration. Recurrent inhibition elicited by a conditioning reflex discharge (H1) was assessed by a subsequent test reflex (H'). Four patients lacked an H' reflex. In approximately 50% of the remaining patients, recurrent inhibition was normal, while in the other half there was evidence of reduced or absent inhibitory activity at rest. Pooling the data relative to the effect of L-acetylcarnitine on the H-reflex in relation to the strength of recurrent inhibition disclosed that the ratio of peak-to-peak amplitude values of the maximum H reflex to maximum M wave responses (Hmax:Mmax) was reduced in all the cases in which the recurrent inhibition at rest was normal, while such a reduction was never observed in the patients in whom recurrent inhibition was found to be decreased at rest. In the former cases, the size of the H' reflex evoked by the same conditioning H1 discharge was further depressed after L-acetylcarnitine, pointing to a potentiating effect of the drug on Renshaw cells; in the latter cases no such effect was seen. A significant decrease in the mean Hmax:Mmax ratio after L-acetylcarnitine intake was also seen in the healthy control subjects. Possible changes in the amount of presynaptic inhibition on Ia terminals on soleus motor neurons after L- acetylcarnitine were ruled out. It is proposed that the differential effect of the drug on the H-reflex excitability is directly related to the level of Renshaw cell activity, a reduction of which probably follows a lesion interrupting reticulo-spinal pathways with tonic facilitatory influences on Renshaw cells. These findings support the hypothesis that Renshaw cell excitability is set via cortico-reticulo- spinal systems.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
J.-C. Lamy, I. Wargon, D. Mazevet, Z. Ghanim, P. Pradat-Diehl, and R. Katz
Impaired efficacy of spinal presynaptic mechanisms in spastic stroke patients
Brain, March 1, 2009; 132(3): 734 - 748.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
X. Y. Chen, L. Chen, Y. Chen, and J. R. Wolpaw
Operant Conditioning of Reciprocal Inhibition in Rat Soleus Muscle
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 2144 - 2150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. A. Gorassini, M. E. Knash, P. J. Harvey, D. J. Bennett, and J. F. Yang
Role of motoneurons in the generation of muscle spasms after spinal cord injury
Brain, October 1, 2004; 127(10): 2247 - 2258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
I. Hammar and E. Jankowska
Modulatory Effects of alpha 1-,alpha 2-, and beta -Receptor Agonists on Feline Spinal Interneurons with Monosynaptic Input from Group I Muscle Afferents
J. Neurosci., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 332 - 338.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H. Morita, C. Crone, D. Christenhuis, N. T. Petersen, and J. B. Nielsen
Modulation of presynaptic inhibition and disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition during voluntary movement in spasticity
Brain, April 1, 2001; 124(4): 826 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. F. Iles, A. Ali, and J. Pardoe
Task-related changes of transmission in the pathway of heteronymous spinal recurrent inhibition from soleus to quadriceps motor neurones in man
Brain, November 1, 2000; 123(11): 2264 - 2272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. Aymard, R. Katz, C. Lafitte, E. Lo, A. Penicaud, P. Pradat-Diehl, and S. Raoul
Presynaptic inhibition and homosynaptic depression: A comparison between lower and upper limbs in normal human subjects and patients with hemiplegia
Brain, August 1, 2000; 123(8): 1688 - 1702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. F. Iles and J. Pardoe
Changes in transmission in the pathway of heteronymous spinal recurrent inhibition from soleus to quadriceps motor neurons during movement in man
Brain, September 1, 1999; 122(9): 1757 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Faist, M. Ertel, W. Berger, and V. Dietz
Impaired modulation of quadriceps tendon jerk reflex during spastic gait: differences between spinal and cerebral lesions
Brain, March 1, 1999; 122(3): 567 - 579.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.