Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (92)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magistris, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magistris, M. R.
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 121, Issue 3 437-450, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle. A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials

MR Magistris, KM Rosler, A Truffert and JP Myers
Department of Clinical Neurology, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland.

Transcranial stimulation has become an established method in the evaluation of corticospinal tract function. Clinical studies mainly address slowing of conduction through measurement of increased central conduction time (CCT) and 'failures' of conduction through observation of marked reductions in the size of the motor evoked potential (MEP). While CCT is of great interest in detecting subclinical slowing of conduction, the method discloses only gross failures of conduction, since the size of the MEP varies markedly between normal subjects and from one stimulus to another, leading to a broad range of normal values. Furthermore, transcranial stimulation does not appear to achieve depolarization of all spinal motor neurons leading to the target muscles, since in most normal subjects MEPs are smaller in amplitude than the responses evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation. We have developed a triple stimulation technique (TST) which, through two collisions, links central to peripheral conduction and suppresses desynchronization of MEPs. This technique shows that transcranial stimulation does achieve depolarization of all, or nearly all, spinal motor neurons supplying the target muscle in healthy subjects. Our data thus demonstrate that the amplitudes of MEPs are (i) smaller than those of peripheral responses, mostly due to phase cancellation of the action potentials caused by the desynchronization occurring within the corticospinal tract or at spinal cell level and (ii) variable between normal subjects and from one stimulus to another, mostly due to variability of this desynchronization. This technique provides new insights into normal corticospinal tract conduction. It will improve detection and quantification of central motor conduction failures.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mult SclerHome page
A Rico, B Audoin, J Franques, A Eusebio, F Reuter, I Malikova, A Ali Cherif, J Pouget, J Pelletier, and S Attarian
Motor evoked potentials in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2009; 15(3): 355 - 362.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. Vucic and M. C. Kiernan
Novel threshold tracking techniques suggest that cortical hyperexcitability is an early feature of motor neuron disease
Brain, September 1, 2006; 129(9): 2436 - 2446.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A M Humm, W J Z'Graggen, R Buhler, M R Magistris, and K M Rosler
Quantification of central motor conduction deficits in multiple sclerosis patients before and after treatment of acute exacerbation by methylprednisolone
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 77(3): 345 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
Y Ueki, T Mima, T Oga, A Ikeda, T Hitomi, H Fukuyama, T Nagamine, and H Shibasaki
Dominance of ipsilateral corticospinal pathway in congenital mirror movements
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 76(2): 276 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
U. Ziemann, T. V. Ilic, H. Alle, and F. Meintzschel
Cortico-motoneuronal excitation of three hand muscles determined by a novel penta-stimulation technique
Brain, August 1, 2004; 127(8): 1887 - 1898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
K. R. Mills
The natural history of central motor abnormalities in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Brain, November 1, 2003; 126(11): 2558 - 2566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
B. Andersen, B. Westlund, and C. Krarup
Failure of activation of spinal motoneurones after muscle fatigue in healthy subjects studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation
J. Physiol., August 15, 2003; 551(1): 345 - 356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
J. B Pitcher, K. M Ogston, and T. S Miles
Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input-output characteristics
J. Physiol., January 15, 2003; 546(2): 605 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. J Carroll, S. Riek, and R. G Carson
The sites of neural adaptation induced by resistance training in humans
J. Physiol., October 15, 2002; 544(2): 641 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PhysiologyHome page
K. M. Rosler
Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation: a Tool to Investigate Central Motor Pathways
Physiology, December 1, 2001; 16(6): 297 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. R. Magistris, K. M. Rosler, A. Truffert, T. Landis, and C. W. Hess
A clinical study of motor evoked potentials using a triple stimulation technique
Brain, February 1, 1999; 122(2): 265 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.