Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (100)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garrard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garrard, P.
Right arrow Articles by Hodges, J. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 121, Issue 4 633-646, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Category specific semantic loss in dementia of Alzheimer's type. Functional-anatomical correlations from cross-sectional analyses

P Garrard, K Patterson, PC Watson and JR Hodges
University Neurology Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

In the context of focal brain injury, selective loss of semantic knowledge in the domain of either natural kinds or artefacts is usually considered to reflect the differential importance of temporal and frontoparietal regions to the representations of perceptual and functional attributes, respectively. It is harder to account far as a feature of a more diffuse process, and previous cross-sectional analyses of patients with dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) have differed over whether category effects occur. In our series of 58 patients with probable DAT, we demonstrated a significant group advantage for artefacts, and explored possible reasons for the inconsistency of this finding in other studies. A multiple single-case strategy revealed not only individuals with consistent advantages for artefacts but also individuals with consistent advantages for natural kinds. By ranking the individuals according to measures of naming performance and global intellectual ability, we showed that the strength of the group advantage for artefacts was dependent on the former but not the latter variable. The findings are discussed in the context of two competing theories of semantic breakdown in DAT. One differentiates between domains of knowledge in terms of the structure of semantic representations within a single distributed network; the other emphasizes the importance of different brain regions in the category distinction. We conclude that our findings are in keeping with the predictions of the latter hypothesis.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Koenig, E. E. Smith, V. Troiani, C. Anderson, P. Moore, and M. Grossman
Medial Temporal Lobe Involvement in an Implicit Memory Task: Evidence of Collaborating Implicit and Explicit Memory Systems from fMRI and Alzheimer's Disease
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2008; 18(12): 2831 - 2843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. D. Rohrer, W. D. Knight, J. E. Warren, N. C. Fox, M. N. Rossor, and J. D. Warren
Word-finding difficulty: a clinical analysis of the progressive aphasias
Brain, January 1, 2008; 131(1): 8 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. R. Hodges
Alzheimer's centennial legacy: origins, landmarks and the current status of knowledge concerning cognitive aspects.
Brain, November 1, 2006; 129(Pt 11): 2811 - 2822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
QJMHome page
P.K. Panegyres
The contribution of the study of neurodegenerative disorders to the understanding of human memory
QJM, September 1, 2004; 97(9): 555 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Grossman, C. McMillan, P. Moore, L. Ding, G. Glosser, M. Work, and J. Gee
What's in a name: voxel-based morphometric analyses of MRI and naming difficulty in Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration
Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 628 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. A. Lambon Ralph, K. Patterson, N. Graham, K. Dawson, and J. R. Hodges
Homogeneity and heterogeneity in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study of 55 cases
Brain, November 1, 2003; 126(11): 2350 - 2362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
M.-H. Soriani-Lefevre, D. Hannequin, S. Bakchine, J.-F. Menard, A. Manrique, A. Hitzel, P.-O. Kotzki, V. Boudousq, and P. Vera
Evidence of Bilateral Temporal Lobe Involvement in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A SPECT Study
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2003; 44(7): 1013 - 1022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Grossman, P. Koenig, G. Glosser, C. DeVita, P. Moore, J. Rhee, J. Detre, D. Alsop, and J. Gee
Neural basis for semantic memory difficulty in Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI study
Brain, February 1, 2003; 126(2): 292 - 311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J Calderon, R J Perry, S W Erzinclioglu, G E Berrios, T R Dening, and J R Hodges
Perception, attention, and working memory are disproportionately impaired in dementia with Lewy bodies compared with Alzheimer's disease
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2001; 70(2): 157 - 164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
C. J. Moore and C. J. Price
A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences
Brain, May 1, 1999; 122(5): 943 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
J. A. Harasty, G. M. Halliday, J. J. Kril, and C. Code
Specific temporoparietal gyral atrophy reflects the pattern of language dissolution in Alzheimer's disease
Brain, April 1, 1999; 122(4): 675 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.