Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (39)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strupp, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strupp, M.
Right arrow Articles by Brandt, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 121, Issue 4 677-685, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Perceptual and oculomotor effects of neck muscle vibration in vestibular neuritis. Ipsilateral somatosensory substitution of vestibular function

M Strupp, V Arbusow, M Dieterich, W Sautier and T Brandt
Department of Neurology, University of Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Germany.

Afferent cervical somatosensory input may substitute for absent vestibular information as part of central vestibular compensation after unilateral peripheral vestibular deficit. In order to determine the particular contribution of neck muscle spindles to the perception of body orientation and to the oculomotor system, we measured (i) the subjective visual straight ahead (SVA) by psychophysical tests and (ii) the changes in eye position by video-nystagmography during unilateral stimulation of the posterior neck muscles by vibration (100 Hz). Twenty- five patients with subacute unilateral vestibular lesion (vestibular neuritis) and 25 controls participated in the study. Vibration elicited a horizontal displacement of SVA towards the side of stimulation in all subjects. Mean displacement (+/- SD) was 3.28 +/- 2.96 degrees for right-side and 3.45 +/- 2.93 degrees for left-side stimulation in controls. Muscle stimulation on the patients' lesion side induced a significantly higher displacement (11.51 +/- 6.63 degrees) than contralateral stimulation (3.04 +/- 2.95 degrees, P < 0.01, paired Student's t test). The mean difference during stimulation between the two sides in the patients was 8.02 +/- 5.52 degrees; in the controls, however, it was only 0.74 +/- 0.47 degree (P < 0.001, Student's t test). This asymmetry increased gradually in patients over a period of weeks, reaching a maximum at days 60-80 and declining thereafter. Videonystagmography revealed that ipsilateral stimulation in patients induced large horizontal eye deviations of up to 25 degrees towards the side of the lesion (9.1 +/- 7.6 degrees, n = 18). Contralateral stimulation induced only small shifts, which were within the range of controls. The correlation coefficient between displacement of the SVA and change in eye position was high (r = 0.94, P < 0.0001), indicating that the shift of SVA is the perceptual correlate of the directional change of gaze in space. This interpretation was supported by two control experiments in which the subject was required to (i) indicate the subjective straight ahead by finger-pointing with the eyes closed and (ii) adjust SVA when looking through horizontally reversing prisms. Vibration of neck muscles caused almost no displacement of the SVA when it was indicated by pointing with the eyes closed, but reversed the direction of the displacement if the subject wore reversing prisms. In summary, our data showed: (i) an increase in muscle spindle input following unilateral vestibular lesion; (ii) this increase is asymmetrical, restricted to the affected side, and gradually builds up over weeks; and (iii) the perceived effects during vibration are secondary to changes in eye position rather than changes in cortical representation of body orientation. This is the first study to demonstrate a unilateral increase in somatosensory weight, which substitutes for missing vestibular input.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Deutschlander, K. Hufner, R. Kalla, T. Stephan, T. Dera, S. Glasauer, M. Wiesmann, M. Strupp, and T. Brandt
Unilateral vestibular failure suppresses cortical visual motion processing
Brain, April 1, 2008; 131(4): 1025 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Leal-Campanario, J. M. Delgado-Garcia, and A. Gruart
Microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex can substitute for vibrissa stimulation during Pavlovian conditioning
PNAS, June 27, 2006; 103(26): 10052 - 10057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
P Jombik and V Bahyl
Short latency responses in the averaged electro-oculogram elicited by vibrational impulse stimuli applied to the skull: could they reflect vestibulo-ocular reflex function?
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2005; 76(2): 222 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
B. D. Corneil and R. A. Andersen
Dorsal Neck Muscle Vibration Induces Upward Shifts in the Endpoints of Memory-Guided Saccades in Monkeys
J Neurophysiol, July 1, 2004; 92(1): 553 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. Karlberg, S. T. Aw, R. A. Black, M. J. Todd, H. G. MacDougall, and G. M. Halmagyi
Vibration-induced ocular torsion and nystagmus after unilateral vestibular deafferentation
Brain, April 1, 2003; 126(4): 956 - 964.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck SurgHome page
M. Karlberg, S. T. Aw, G. M. Halmagyi, and R. A. Black
Vibration-Induced Shift of the Subjective Visual Horizontal: A Sign of Unilateral Vestibular Deficit
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, January 1, 2002; 128(1): 21 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.