Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farmer, S. F.
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 121, Issue 5 801-814, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Abnormal motor unit synchronization of antagonist muscles underlies pathological co-contraction in upper limb dystonia

SF Farmer, GL Sheean, MJ Mayston, JC Rothwell, CD Marsden, BA Conway, DM Halliday, JR Rosenberg and JA Stephens
Department of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.

The aim of this study was to examine the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying co-contraction in patients with dystonia (n = 6) and writer's cramp (n = 5). Multi-unit needle and surface EMGs were recorded from extensor carpi radialis (ECR) and flexor carpi radialis (FCR) muscles during motor tasks that elicited dystonia or writer's cramp. The EMGs from ECR and FCR were recorded simultaneously and analysed using cross-correlation analysis. Similar recordings were obtained from healthy age- and sex-matched control subjects (n = 8). Despite co-contraction of the muscles, cross-correlograms from the healthy subjects did not reveal evidence of motor unit synchronization. Cross-correlograms from the dystonic subjects revealed a central peak with a median duration of 37 ms, indicating broad-peak motor unit synchronization. Cross-correlograms from patients with writer's cramp were either flat or modulated by a 11-12-Hz tremor. Frequency-domain analysis of ECR and FCR EMGs demonstrated significant coherence in the patients with dystonia and writer's cramp. These results indicate that co-contraction in dystonia is neurophysiologically distinct from voluntary co-contraction and is produced by abnormal synchronization of presynaptic inputs to antagonist motor neuron pools. ECR and FCR co- contraction in writer's cramp may be a compensatory process under voluntary control.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Chiken, P. Shashidharan, and A. Nambu
Cortically Evoked Long-Lasting Inhibition of Pallidal Neurons in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Dystonia
J. Neurosci., December 17, 2008; 28(51): 13967 - 13977.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Arisi, D. Zoccolan, and V. Torre
Distributed Motor Pattern Underlying Whole-Body Shortening in the Medicinal Leech
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2001; 86(5): 2475 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
B-U Meyer, K Irlbacher, and H Meierkord
Analysis of stimuli triggering attacks of paroxysmal dystonia induced by exertion
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2001; 70(2): 247 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
M. A. J. Tijssen, J. F. Marsden, and P. Brown
Frequency analysis of EMG activity in patients with idiopathic torticollis
Brain, April 1, 2000; 123(4): 677 - 686.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
M. Tinazzi, A. Priori, L. Bertolasi, E. Frasson, F. Mauguiere, and A. Fiaschi
Abnormal central integration of a dual somatosensory input in dystonia : Evidence for sensory overflow
Brain, January 1, 2000; 123(1): 42 - 50.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.