Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (50)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mark, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rugg, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mark, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Rugg, M. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 121, Issue 5 861-873, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Age effects on brain activity associated with episodic memory retrieval. An electrophysiological study

RE Mark and MD Rugg
Wellcome Brain Research Group, School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, UK.

Electrophysiological correlates of episodic memory retrieval (recollection) were investigated in a young (18-30 years) and an older group (62-79 years) of healthy subjects (n = 16 per group). At study, subjects listened to words spoken in either a male or a female voice, and were instructed to perform one of two tasks depending on the voice in which the item was spoken. At test, subjects made initial old/new judgements to visually presented words and, for words judged old, either indicated in which voice they had heard the word at study (source task), or whether the 'remembered' or 'knew' they had heard the word at study ('remember/know' task). The accuracy of the initial recognition decision did not differ between the two groups. However, young subjects were significantly more accurate in their source judgements than the older group. The magnitudes and topographical distributions of differences between event related potentials to successfully recollected words and new words were indistinguishable for the two tasks. These event-related potential effects were also equivalent in magnitude and scalp topography in the two age groups, the only difference between the groups being a relative delay in the onset of the effects at some electrode sites in the older subjects. These findings are consistent with the proposal that the processes supporting episodic retrieval, including those dependent upon the prefrontal cortex, are relatively unaffected by advancing age.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Duarte, R. N. Henson, and K. S. Graham
The Effects of Aging on the Neural Correlates of Subjective and Objective Recollection
Cereb Cortex, September 1, 2008; 18(9): 2169 - 2180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cogn Affect Behav NeurosciHome page
S. CANSINO and P. TREJO-MORALES
Neurophysiology of successful encoding and retrieval of source memory
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci, March 1, 2008; 8(1): 85 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
T. Wu and M. Hallett
The influence of normal human ageing on automatic movements
J. Physiol., January 15, 2005; 562(2): 605 - 615.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
S. Rossi, C. Miniussi, P. Pasqualetti, C. Babiloni, P. M. Rossini, and S. F. Cappa
Age-Related Functional Changes of Prefrontal Cortex in Long-Term Memory: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study
J. Neurosci., September 8, 2004; 24(36): 7939 - 7944.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.