Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (20)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weiskrantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Le Mare, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weiskrantz, L.
Right arrow Articles by Le Mare, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 121, Issue 6 1065-1072, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ARTICLES

Learning from the pupil: a spatial visual channel in the absence of V1 in monkey and human

L Weiskrantz, A Cowey and C Le Mare
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.

The pupil of the normal human subject constricts in response not only to average increases in light energy, but also selectively to the spatial structure of a visual stimulus even when there are no energy changes. This enables one to measure visual acuity and sensitivity as a function of spatial frequency. It is known that pupillometric measures of acuity correlate well with those determined psychophysically for normal human observers. The purpose of the present study was to measure pupillary changes with stimuli delivered to the 'blind' hemifields of monkeys with unilateral V1 removal, and also with stimulation of a human subject (G.Y.) with putative V1 destruction. The results show that there are small but reliable pupillary changes to flux-equated gratings in the blind fields both in monkeys and human. The response profile in both species is very similar: it is narrowly tuned, with a peak at approximately 1 cycle/degree and a cut-off acuity of approximately 7 or 8 cycles/degree, a significant reduction compared with the intact hemifield. The result also maps well onto the psychophysically determined spatiotemporal response profile to gratings in the blind field, as determined independently for G.Y. Thus, there is a narrowly tuned spatial visual channel that does not require the integrity of V1 in monkey or human. There was no evidence under these particular conditions in either monkeys or subject G.Y. of a pupillary response to an equiluminant change from white to green or red in the hemianopic field. The pupil holds promise as a non-verbal, indirect method for determining the spatial profile, sensitivity and other properties of residual visual capacity, both in animals and humans.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. de Gelder, J. S. Morris, and R. J. Dolan
Unconscious fear influences emotional awareness of faces and voices
PNAS, December 20, 2005; 102(51): 18682 - 18687.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
B. J. Wilhelm, H. Wilhelm, S. Moro, and J. L. Barbur
Pupil response components: studies in patients with Parinaud's syndrome
Brain, October 1, 2002; 125(10): 2296 - 2307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. L. Barbur, L. Weiskrantz, and J. A. Harlow
The unseen color aftereffect of an unseen stimulus: Insight from blindsight into mechanisms of color afterimages
PNAS, September 28, 1999; 96(20): 11637 - 11641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. Weiskrantz, A. Cowey, and J. L. Barbur
Differential pupillary constriction and awareness in the absence of striate cortex
Brain, August 1, 1999; 122(8): 1533 - 1538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.