Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (42)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Dehaene, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Dehaene, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol 121, Issue 9 1641-1659, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Competition between past and present. Assessment and interpretation of verbal perseverations

L Cohen and S Dehaene
Service de Neurologie, Hopital de la Salpetriere, Paris, France. laurent.cohen@psl.ap-hop-paris.fr

Perseveration consists of the inappropriate repetition of a preceding behaviour when a new adapted response is expected. We have developed statistical tools that make it possible to reveal such perseverations, assess their significance and study their finer characteristics, such as their temporal course and impaired processing level. This approach is illustrated and evaluated through analyses of naming errors produced by three patients with impairments affecting different stages of the processing chain leading from visual perception to speech production. These examples of perseverations include the intrusion not only of whole words (patient R.A.V.) but also of isolated phonemes (patient D.U.M.) or of visual features (patient Y.M.) from previous trials. In all cases, the probability that an error is a perseveration from a previous trial is an exponentially decreasing function of the lag between the two trials considered. This suggests that perseverations reflect a decaying internal variable, such as an internal level of activation of previous utterances. Based on these empirical results, we put forward a tentative mechanism for the generation of perseverations: whenever a given processing level is deprived of its normal input, persistent activity inherited from previous trials is no longer overcome by current input, and is revealed in the form of perseverations.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Cereb CortexHome page
L. Cohen, O. Martinaud, C. Lemer, S. Lehericy, Y. Samson, M. Obadia, A. Slachevsky, and S. Dehaene
Visual Word Recognition in the Left and Right Hemispheres: Anatomical and Functional Correlates of Peripheral Alexias
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2003; 13(12): 1313 - 1333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
S. J. Crutch and E. K. Warrington
Refractory dyslexia: Evidence of multiple task-specific phonological output stores
Brain, August 1, 2001; 124(8): 1533 - 1543.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BrainHome page
L. Cohen, S. Dehaene, L. Naccache, S. Lehericy, G. Dehaene-Lambertz, M.-A. Henaff, and F. Michel
The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients
Brain, February 1, 2000; 123(2): 291 - 307.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.