Brain, Vol. 122, No. 2, 265-279,
February 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press
A clinical study of motor evoked potentials using a triple stimulation technique
1 Departments of Clinical Neurology, Geneva and 2 Berne University Hospitals, Switzerland
Correspondence to:
Dr Michel R. Magistris, Unité d'Electroneuromyographie, Clinique de Neurologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland E-mail: michel.magistris{at}hcuge.ch
Amplitudes of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) are usually much smaller than those of motor responses to maximal peripheral nerve stimulation, and show marked variation between normal subjects and from one stimulus to another. Consequently, amplitude measurements have low sensitivity to detect central motor conduction failures due to the broad range of normal values. Since these characteristics are mostly due to varying desynchronization of the descending action potentials, causing different degrees of phase cancellation, we applied the recently developed triple stimulation technique (TST) to study corticospinal conduction to 489 abductor digiti minimi muscles of 271 unselected patients referred for possible corticospinal dysfunction. The TST allows resynchronization of the MEP, and thereby a quantification of the proportion of motor units activated by the transcranial stimulus. TST results were compared with those of conventional MEPs. In 212 of 489 sides, abnormal TST responses suggested conduction failure of various degrees. By contrast, conventional MEPs detected conduction failures in only 77 of 489 sides. The TST was therefore 2.75 times more sensitive than conventional MEPs in disclosing corticospinal conduction failures. When the results of the TST and conventional MEPs were combined, 225 sides were abnormal: 145 sides showed central conduction failure, 13 sides central conduction slowing and 67 sides both conduction failure and slowing. It is concluded that the TST is a valuable addition to the study of MEPs, since it improves detection and gives quantitative information on central conduction failure, an abnormality which appears to be much more frequent than conduction slowing. This new technique will be useful in following the natural course and the benefit of treatments in disorders affecting central motor conduction.
collision technique; corticospinal tract; magnetic transcranial stimulation; transcranial cortical stimulation; quantification of central motor conduction defects
ADM = abductor digiti minimi; ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CMAP = compound muscle action potential (evoked by peripheral stimulation); CMAPErb = CMAP evoked by Erb's point stimulation; CMAPwrist = CMAP evoked by wrist stimulation; CMCT = central motor conduction time; MEP = motor evoked potential (evoked by transcranial stimulation); MRV = mean rectified voltage (of maximal voluntary isometric EMG activity); TST = triple stimulation technique
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A Rico, B Audoin, J Franques, A Eusebio, F Reuter, I Malikova, A Ali Cherif, J Pouget, J Pelletier, and S Attarian Motor evoked potentials in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2009; 15(3): 355 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A M Humm, W J Z'Graggen, R Buhler, M R Magistris, and K M Rosler Quantification of central motor conduction deficits in multiple sclerosis patients before and after treatment of acute exacerbation by methylprednisolone J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, March 1, 2006; 77(3): 345 - 350. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 U. Ziemann, T. V. Ilic, H. Alle, and F. Meintzschel Cortico-motoneuronal excitation of three hand muscles determined by a novel penta-stimulation technique Brain, August 1, 2004; 127(8): 1887 - 1898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Andersen, B. Westlund, and C. Krarup Failure of activation of spinal motoneurones after muscle fatigue in healthy subjects studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation J. Physiol., August 15, 2003; 551(1): 345 - 356. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B Pitcher, K. M Ogston, and T. S Miles Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input-output characteristics J. Physiol., January 15, 2003; 546(2): 605 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Curra, N. Modugno, M. Inghilleri, M. Manfredi, M. Hallett, and A. Berardelli Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation Neurology, December 24, 2002; 59(12): 1851 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. M. Rosler Transcranial Magnetic Brain Stimulation: a Tool to Investigate Central Motor Pathways Physiology, December 1, 2001; 16(6): 297 - 302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|