Brain, Vol. 122, No. 6, 1147-1155,
June 1999
© 1999 Oxford University Press
Visual evoked potentials in migraine patients: alterations depend on pattern spatial frequency
1 Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology and 2 Department of Neurology, University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany
Correspondence to:
Rieke Oelkers, MD, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Heidelberg, Blumenstrasse 8, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany E-mail: rieke_oelkers{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de
Visual information is conducted by two parallel pathways (luminance- and contour-processing pathways) which are thought to be differentially affected in migraine and can be investigated by means of pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Components and habituation of VEPs at four spatial frequencies were compared between 26 migraineurs (13 without aura, MO; 13 with aura, MA) and 28 healthy volunteers. Migraineurs were recorded in the headache-free interval (at least 72 h before and after an attack). Five blocks of 50 responses to chequerboards of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 cycles per degree (c.p.d.) were sequentially averaged and analysed for latency and amplitude. Differences in VEPs were dependent on spatial frequency. Only when small checks were presented, i.e. at high spatial frequency (2 and 4 c.p.d.), was the latency of N2 significantly prolonged in MA and did it tend to be delayed in MO subjects. Habituation behaviour was not significantly different between groups under the stimulating conditions employed. Prolonged N2 latency might be explained by the lack or attenuation of a contour-specific component N130 in migraineurs, indicating an imbalance of the two visual pathways with relative predominance of the luminance-processing Y system. These results reflect an interictally persisting dysfunction of precortical visual processing which might be relevant in the pathophysiology of migraine.
migraine; visual evoked potential; pattern spatial frequency; habituation; pathophysiology
c.p.d. = cycles per degree; d.f. = degrees of freedom; MA = migraine with aura; MO = migraine without aura; VAS = visual analogue scale; VEP = visual evoked potential
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  W-T Chen, S-J Wang, J-L Fuh, C-P Lin, Y-C Ko, and Y-Y Lin Peri-ictal Normalization of Visual Cortex Excitability in Migraine: an MEG Study Cephalalgia, November 1, 2009; 29(11): 1202 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Magis, A Ambrosini, L Bendtsen, M Ertas, H Kaube, J Schoenen, and (EUROHEAD project) Evaluation and Proposal for Optimalization of Neurophysiological Tests in Migraine: Part 1--Electrophysiological Tests Cephalalgia, December 1, 2007; 27(12): 1323 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. S. Tibber and A. J. Shepherd Transient Tritanopia in Migraine: Evidence for a Large-Field Retinal Abnormality in Blue-Yellow Opponent Pathways Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 5125 - 5131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Shepherd Colour Vision in Migraine: Selective Deficits for S-Cone Discriminations Cephalalgia, June 1, 2005; 25(6): 412 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R Oelkers-Ax, P Parzer, F Resch, and M Weisbrod Maturation of Early Visual Processing Investigated by a Pattern-Reversal Habituation Paradigm is Altered in Migraine Cephalalgia, April 1, 2005; 25(4): 280 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Ambrosini, A. de Noordhout, P. Sandor, and J Schoenen Electrophysiological Studies in Migraine: A Comprehensive Review of Their Interest and Limitations Cephalalgia, May 1, 2003; 23(1_suppl): 13 - 31. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Bohotin, A. Fumal, M Vandenheede, P. Gerard, C. Bohotin, A. Maertens de Noordhout, and J. Schoenen Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual evoked potentials in migraine Brain, April 1, 2002; 125(4): 912 - 922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K Benedek, J Tajti, M Janaky, L Vecsei, and G Benedek Spatial Contrast Sensitivity of Migraine Patients Without Aura Cephalalgia, March 1, 2002; 22(2): 142 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. Shepherd Increased visual after-effects following pattern adaptation in migraine: a lack of intracortical excitation? Brain, November 1, 2001; 124(11): 2310 - 2318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N Galeotti, C Ghelardini, M Zoppi, E Del Bene, L Raimondi, E Beneforti, and A Bartolini Hypofunctionality of Gi Proteins as Aetiopathogenic Mechanism for Migraine and Cluster Headache Cephalalgia, February 1, 2001; 21(1): 38 - 45. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Sand and J V. Vingen Visual, Long-Latency Auditory and Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials in Migraine: Relation to Pattern Size, Stimulus Intensity, Sound and Light Discomfort Thresholds and Pre-Attack State Cephalalgia, November 1, 2000; 20(9): 804 - 820. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|