Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (126)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cirstea, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, M. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cirstea, M. C.
Right arrow Articles by Levin, M. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 123, No. 5, 940-953, May 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke

M. C. Cirstea1,3 and M. F. Levin2,3

1 Neurological Science Research Centre and 2 School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal and 3 Research Centre, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Canada

Correspondence to: Mindy F. Levin, Research Centre, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3S 2J4 E-mail: levinm{at}ere.umontreal.ca

A major prerequisite for successful rehabilitation therapy after stroke is the understanding of the mechanisms underlying motor deficits common to these patients. Studies have shown that in stroke patients multijoint pointing movements are characterized by decreased movement speed and increased movement variability, by increased movement segmentation and by spatial and temporal incoordination between adjacent arm joints with respect to healthy subjects. We studied how the damaged nervous system recovers or compensates for deficits in reaching, and correlated reaching deficits with the level of functional impairment. Nine right-hemiparetic subjects and nine healthy subjects participated. All subjects were right-hand dominant. Data from the affected arm of hemiparetic subjects were compared with those from the arm in healthy subjects. Seated subjects made 40 pointing movements with the right arm in a single session. Movements were made from an initial target, for which the arm was positioned alongside the trunk. Then the subject lifted the arm and pointed to the final target, located in front of the subject in the contralateral workspace. Kinematic data from the arm and trunk were recorded with a three-dimensional analysis system. Arm movements in stroke subjects were longer, more segmented, more variable and had larger movement errors. Elbow–shoulder coordination was disrupted and the range of active joint motion was decreased significantly compared with healthy subjects. Some aspects of motor performance (duration, segmentation, accuracy and coordination) were significantly correlated with the level of motor impairment. Despite the fact that stroke subjects encountered all these deficits, even subjects with the most severe motor impairment were able to transport the end-point to the target. All but one subject involved the trunk to accomplish this motor task. In others words, they recruited new degrees of freedom typically not used by healthy subjects. The use of compensatory strategies may be related to the degree of motor impairment: severely to moderately impaired subjects recruited new degrees of freedom to compensate for motor deficits while mildly impaired subjects tended to employ healthy movement patterns. We discuss the possibility that there is a critical level of recovery at which patients switch from a strategy employing new degrees of freedom to one in which motor recovery is produced by improving the management of degrees of freedom characteristic of healthy performance. Our data also suggest that stroke subjects may be able to exploit effectively the redundancy of the motor system.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
H.-h. Huang, L. Fetters, J. Hale, and A. McBride
Bound for Success: A Systematic Review of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Children With Cerebral Palsy Supports Improved Arm and Hand Use
Physical Therapy, November 1, 2009; 89(11): 1126 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
S. G. Sangani, A. J. Starsky, J. R. McGuire, and B. D. Schmit
Multijoint Reflex Responses to Constant-Velocity Volitional Movements of the Stroke Elbow
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2009; 102(3): 1398 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
G.B. Prange, M.J.A. Jannink, A.H.A. Stienen, H. van der Kooij, M.J. IJzerman, and H.J. Hermens
Influence of Gravity Compensation on Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Temporal Phases of Arm Movements of Stroke Patients
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 478 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. U. Blicher, J. Jakobsen, G. Andersen, and J. F. Nielsen
Cortical Excitability in Chronic Stroke and Modulation by Training: A TMS Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 486 - 493.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. F. Levin, J. A. Kleim, and S. L. Wolf
What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke?
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 313 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk, S. B. Davis, C. R. Senesac, S. Kautz, and L. G. Richards
Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 78 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
G. Thielman, T. Kaminski, and A.M. Gentile
Rehabilitation of Reaching After Stroke: Comparing 2 Training Protocols Utilizing Trunk Restraint
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 697 - 705.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
I. Eisner-Janowicz, S. Barbay, E. Hoover, A. M. Stowe, S. B. Frost, E. J. Plautz, and R. J. Nudo
Early and Late Changes in the Distal Forelimb Representation of the Supplementary Motor Area After Injury to Frontal Motor Areas in the Squirrel Monkey
J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1498 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. Langan and P. van Donkelaar
The Influence of Hand Dominance on the Response to a Constraint-Induced Therapy Program Following Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 298 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
J. M Wagner, J. A Rhodes, and C. Patten
Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke
Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 652 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 111 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
R. Colombo, F. Pisano, S. Micera, A. Mazzone, C. Delconte, M.C. Carrozza, P. Dario, and G. Minuco
Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 50 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
N. Yozbatiran, L. Der-Yeghiaian, and S. C. Cramer
A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 78 - 90.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
M.C. Cirstea and M.F. Levin
Improvement of Arm Movement Patterns and Endpoint Control Depends on Type of Feedback During Practice in Stroke Survivors
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 398 - 411.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
L. Dipietro, H. I. Krebs, S. E. Fasoli, B. T. Volpe, J. Stein, C. Bever, and N. Hogan
Changing Motor Synergies in Chronic Stroke
J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 757 - 768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
C. E. Lang and J. A. Beebe
Relating Movement Control at 9 Upper Extremity Segments to Loss of Hand Function in People with Chronic Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 279 - 291.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
D. S Reisman and J. P Scholz
Deficits in Surface Force Production During Seated Reaching in People After Stroke
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2007; 87(3): 326 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
C. E. Lang, J. M. Wagner, D. F. Edwards, S. A. Sahrmann, and A. W. Dromerick
Recovery of Grasp versus Reach in People with Hemiparesis Poststroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 444 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
N. Dancause
Vicarious Function of Remote Cortex following Stroke: Recent Evidence from Human and Animal Studies
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2006; 12(6): 489 - 499.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
J. M. Wagner, C. E. Lang, S. A. Sahrmann, Q. Hu, A. J. Bastian, D. F. Edwards, and A. W. Dromerick
Relationships between Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Deficits in Acute Hemiparesis
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2006; 20(3): 406 - 416.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
C.M. Cirstea, A. Ptito, and M.F. Levin
Feedback and Cognition in Arm Motor Skill Reacquisition After Stroke
Stroke, May 1, 2006; 37(5): 1237 - 1242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. Michaelsen, R. Dannenbaum, and M. F. Levin
Task-Specific Training With Trunk Restraint on Arm Recovery in Stroke: Randomized Control Trial
Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 186 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Neurorehabil Neural RepairHome page
B. M. Quaney, S. Perera, R. Maletsky, C. W. Luchies, and R. J. Nudo
Impaired Grip Force Modulation in the Ipsilesional Hand after Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke
Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 338 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
P. H. McCrea, J. J. Eng, and A. J. Hodgson
Saturated Muscle Activation Contributes to Compensatory Reaching Strategies After Stroke
J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 2999 - 3008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Wenzelburger, F. Kopper, A. Frenzel, H. Stolze, S. Klebe, A. Brossmann, J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, M. Golge, M. Illert, and G. Deuschl
Hand coordination following capsular stroke
Brain, January 1, 2005; 128(1): 64 - 74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. Michaelsen and M. F. Levin
Short-Term Effects of Practice With Trunk Restraint on Reaching Movements in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Controlled Trial
Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1914 - 1919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Grasso, Y. P. Ivanenko, M. Zago, M. Molinari, G. Scivoletto, V. Castellano, V. Macellari, and F. Lacquaniti
Distributed plasticity of locomotor pattern generators in spinal cord injured patients
Brain, May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1019 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
O. Pyoria, P. Era, and U. Talvitie
Relationships Between Standing Balance and Symmetry Measurements in Patients Following Recent Strokes (<=3 Weeks) or Older Strokes (>=6 Months)
Physical Therapy, February 1, 2004; 84(2): 128 - 136.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. F Levin, J. Desrosiers, D. Beauchemin, N. Bergeron, and A. Rochette
Development and Validation of a Scale for Rating Motor Compensations Used for Reaching in Patients With Hemiparesis: The Reaching Performance Scale
Physical Therapy, January 1, 2004; 84(1): 8 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. Spinazzola, R. Cubelli, and S. Della Sala
Impairments of trunk movements following left or right hemisphere lesions: dissociation between apraxic errors and postural instability
Brain, December 1, 2003; 126(12): 2656 - 2666.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
D. S. Reisman and J. P. Scholz
Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis
Brain, November 1, 2003; 126(11): 2510 - 2527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, J. van der Grond, and A. J.H. Prevo
Probability of Regaining Dexterity in the Flaccid Upper Limb: Impact of Severity of Paresis and Time Since Onset in Acute Stroke
Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2181 - 2186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. A. Bennett, R. S. Wilson, J. A. Schneider, D. A. Evans, C. F. Mendes de Leon, S. E. Arnold, L. L. Barnes, and J. L. Bienias
Education modifies the relation of AD pathology to level of cognitive function in older persons
Neurology, June 24, 2003; 60(12): 1909 - 1915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
J. L. Tillerson and G. W. Miller
Book Review: Forced Limb-Use and Recovery following Brain Injury
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2002; 8(6): 574 - 585.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
B. Rohrer, S. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, R. Hughes, B. Volpe, W. R. Frontera, J. Stein, and N. Hogan
Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery
J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8297 - 8304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. M. Michaelsen, A. Luta, A. Roby-Brami, and M. F. Levin
Effect of Trunk Restraint on the Recovery of Reaching Movements in Hemiparetic Patients
Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1875 - 1883.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.