Brain, Vol. 123, No. 5, 940-953,
May 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke
1 Neurological Science Research Centre and 2 School of Rehabilitation, University of Montreal and 3 Research Centre, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
Correspondence to:
Mindy F. Levin, Research Centre, Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal, 6300 Darlington, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3S 2J4 E-mail: levinm{at}ere.umontreal.ca
A major prerequisite for successful rehabilitation therapy after stroke is the understanding of the mechanisms underlying motor deficits common to these patients. Studies have shown that in stroke patients multijoint pointing movements are characterized by decreased movement speed and increased movement variability, by increased movement segmentation and by spatial and temporal incoordination between adjacent arm joints with respect to healthy subjects. We studied how the damaged nervous system recovers or compensates for deficits in reaching, and correlated reaching deficits with the level of functional impairment. Nine right-hemiparetic subjects and nine healthy subjects participated. All subjects were right-hand dominant. Data from the affected arm of hemiparetic subjects were compared with those from the arm in healthy subjects. Seated subjects made 40 pointing movements with the right arm in a single session. Movements were made from an initial target, for which the arm was positioned alongside the trunk. Then the subject lifted the arm and pointed to the final target, located in front of the subject in the contralateral workspace. Kinematic data from the arm and trunk were recorded with a three-dimensional analysis system. Arm movements in stroke subjects were longer, more segmented, more variable and had larger movement errors. Elbow–shoulder coordination was disrupted and the range of active joint motion was decreased significantly compared with healthy subjects. Some aspects of motor performance (duration, segmentation, accuracy and coordination) were significantly correlated with the level of motor impairment. Despite the fact that stroke subjects encountered all these deficits, even subjects with the most severe motor impairment were able to transport the end-point to the target. All but one subject involved the trunk to accomplish this motor task. In others words, they recruited new degrees of freedom typically not used by healthy subjects. The use of compensatory strategies may be related to the degree of motor impairment: severely to moderately impaired subjects recruited new degrees of freedom to compensate for motor deficits while mildly impaired subjects tended to employ healthy movement patterns. We discuss the possibility that there is a critical level of recovery at which patients switch from a strategy employing new degrees of freedom to one in which motor recovery is produced by improving the management of degrees of freedom characteristic of healthy performance. Our data also suggest that stroke subjects may be able to exploit effectively the redundancy of the motor system.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  G.B. Prange, M.J.A. Jannink, A.H.A. Stienen, H. van der Kooij, M.J. IJzerman, and H.J. Hermens Influence of Gravity Compensation on Muscle Activation Patterns During Different Temporal Phases of Arm Movements of Stroke Patients Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 478 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. U. Blicher, J. Jakobsen, G. Andersen, and J. F. Nielsen Cortical Excitability in Chronic Stroke and Modulation by Training: A TMS Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2009; 23(5): 486 - 493. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F. Levin, J. A. Kleim, and S. L. Wolf What Do Motor "Recovery" and "Compensation" Mean in Patients Following Stroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2009; 23(4): 313 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. L. Woodbury, D. R. Howland, T. E. McGuirk, S. B. Davis, C. R. Senesac, S. Kautz, and L. G. Richards Effects of Trunk Restraint Combined With Intensive Task Practice on Poststroke Upper Extremity Reach and Function: A Pilot Study Neurorehabil Neural Repair, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 78 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Thielman, T. Kaminski, and A.M. Gentile Rehabilitation of Reaching After Stroke: Comparing 2 Training Protocols Utilizing Trunk Restraint Neurorehabil Neural Repair, November 1, 2008; 22(6): 697 - 705. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Eisner-Janowicz, S. Barbay, E. Hoover, A. M. Stowe, S. B. Frost, E. J. Plautz, and R. J. Nudo Early and Late Changes in the Distal Forelimb Representation of the Supplementary Motor Area After Injury to Frontal Motor Areas in the Squirrel Monkey J Neurophysiol, September 1, 2008; 100(3): 1498 - 1512. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Langan and P. van Donkelaar The Influence of Hand Dominance on the Response to a Constraint-Induced Therapy Program Following Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 298 - 304. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M Wagner, J. A Rhodes, and C. Patten Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke Physical Therapy, May 1, 2008; 88(5): 652 - 663. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review Neurorehabil Neural Repair, April 1, 2008; 22(2): 111 - 121. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Colombo, F. Pisano, S. Micera, A. Mazzone, C. Delconte, M.C. Carrozza, P. Dario, and G. Minuco Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 50 - 63. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. Yozbatiran, L. Der-Yeghiaian, and S. C. Cramer A Standardized Approach to Performing the Action Research Arm Test Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2008; 22(1): 78 - 90. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M.C. Cirstea and M.F. Levin Improvement of Arm Movement Patterns and Endpoint Control Depends on Type of Feedback During Practice in Stroke Survivors Neurorehabil Neural Repair, October 1, 2007; 21(5): 398 - 411. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Dipietro, H. I. Krebs, S. E. Fasoli, B. T. Volpe, J. Stein, C. Bever, and N. Hogan Changing Motor Synergies in Chronic Stroke J Neurophysiol, August 1, 2007; 98(2): 757 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Lang and J. A. Beebe Relating Movement Control at 9 Upper Extremity Segments to Loss of Hand Function in People with Chronic Hemiparesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, May 1, 2007; 21(3): 279 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S Reisman and J. P Scholz Deficits in Surface Force Production During Seated Reaching in People After Stroke Physical Therapy, March 1, 2007; 87(3): 326 - 336. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Lang, J. M. Wagner, D. F. Edwards, S. A. Sahrmann, and A. W. Dromerick Recovery of Grasp versus Reach in People with Hemiparesis Poststroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2006; 20(4): 444 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Dancause Vicarious Function of Remote Cortex following Stroke: Recent Evidence from Human and Animal Studies Neuroscientist, December 1, 2006; 12(6): 489 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. Wagner, C. E. Lang, S. A. Sahrmann, Q. Hu, A. J. Bastian, D. F. Edwards, and A. W. Dromerick Relationships between Sensorimotor Impairments and Reaching Deficits in Acute Hemiparesis Neurorehabil Neural Repair, September 1, 2006; 20(3): 406 - 416. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.M. Cirstea, A. Ptito, and M.F. Levin Feedback and Cognition in Arm Motor Skill Reacquisition After Stroke Stroke, May 1, 2006; 37(5): 1237 - 1242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Michaelsen, R. Dannenbaum, and M. F. Levin Task-Specific Training With Trunk Restraint on Arm Recovery in Stroke: Randomized Control Trial Stroke, January 1, 2006; 37(1): 186 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. M. Quaney, S. Perera, R. Maletsky, C. W. Luchies, and R. J. Nudo Impaired Grip Force Modulation in the Ipsilesional Hand after Unilateral Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Neurorehabil Neural Repair, December 1, 2005; 19(4): 338 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. H. McCrea, J. J. Eng, and A. J. Hodgson Saturated Muscle Activation Contributes to Compensatory Reaching Strategies After Stroke J Neurophysiol, November 1, 2005; 94(5): 2999 - 3008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Wenzelburger, F. Kopper, A. Frenzel, H. Stolze, S. Klebe, A. Brossmann, J. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, M. Golge, M. Illert, and G. Deuschl Hand coordination following capsular stroke Brain, January 1, 2005; 128(1): 64 - 74. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Michaelsen and M. F. Levin Short-Term Effects of Practice With Trunk Restraint on Reaching Movements in Patients With Chronic Stroke: A Controlled Trial Stroke, August 1, 2004; 35(8): 1914 - 1919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Grasso, Y. P. Ivanenko, M. Zago, M. Molinari, G. Scivoletto, V. Castellano, V. Macellari, and F. Lacquaniti Distributed plasticity of locomotor pattern generators in spinal cord injured patients Brain, May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1019 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Pyoria, P. Era, and U. Talvitie Relationships Between Standing Balance and Symmetry Measurements in Patients Following Recent Strokes (<=3 Weeks) or Older Strokes (>=6 Months) Physical Therapy, February 1, 2004; 84(2): 128 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. F Levin, J. Desrosiers, D. Beauchemin, N. Bergeron, and A. Rochette Development and Validation of a Scale for Rating Motor Compensations Used for Reaching in Patients With Hemiparesis: The Reaching Performance Scale Physical Therapy, January 1, 2004; 84(1): 8 - 22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Spinazzola, R. Cubelli, and S. Della Sala Impairments of trunk movements following left or right hemisphere lesions: dissociation between apraxic errors and postural instability Brain, December 1, 2003; 126(12): 2656 - 2666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. S. Reisman and J. P. Scholz Aspects of joint coordination are preserved during pointing in persons with post-stroke hemiparesis Brain, November 1, 2003; 126(11): 2510 - 2527. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, J. van der Grond, and A. J.H. Prevo Probability of Regaining Dexterity in the Flaccid Upper Limb: Impact of Severity of Paresis and Time Since Onset in Acute Stroke Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2181 - 2186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. A. Bennett, R. S. Wilson, J. A. Schneider, D. A. Evans, C. F. Mendes de Leon, S. E. Arnold, L. L. Barnes, and J. L. Bienias Education modifies the relation of AD pathology to level of cognitive function in older persons Neurology, June 24, 2003; 60(12): 1909 - 1915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Tillerson and G. W. Miller Book Review: Forced Limb-Use and Recovery following Brain Injury Neuroscientist, December 1, 2002; 8(6): 574 - 585. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Rohrer, S. Fasoli, H. I. Krebs, R. Hughes, B. Volpe, W. R. Frontera, J. Stein, and N. Hogan Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery J. Neurosci., September 15, 2002; 22(18): 8297 - 8304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Michaelsen, A. Luta, A. Roby-Brami, and M. F. Levin Effect of Trunk Restraint on the Recovery of Reaching Movements in Hemiparetic Patients Stroke, August 1, 2001; 32(8): 1875 - 1883. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|