Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (48)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Husain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Husain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Driver, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 123, No. 8, 1643-1659, August 2000
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Distinguishing sensory and motor biases in parietal and frontal neglect

Masud Husain, Jason B. Mattingley, Chris Rorden, Christopher Kennard and Jon Driver

1 Division of Clinical Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, London, 2 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK and 3 Department of Psychology, School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to: Jason B. Mattingley, Department of Psychology, School of Behavioural Science, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia E-mail: j.mattingley{at}psych.unimelb.edu.au

Left neglect after right-hemisphere damage may involve perceptual and/or motor impairments. Here we discuss the limitations of previous attempts to separate these components, and introduce a new method. Six neglect patients (three with right inferior parietal lesions and three with right inferior frontal lesions) moved their right hand to a target light, which appeared unpredictably on either the left or the right of central fixation. The target appeared alone or with a distractor light in the opposite hemifield. Any directional motoric bias was measured by comparing reaches from a central start position with those for the same visual displays, but starting from the left of both possible targets (thus requiring only rightward reaches) or from the right (requiring only leftward reaches). All patients were slower to initiate reaches to left than right targets from a central start, which could reflect perceptual and/or motor biases. Critically, in the parietal neglect group only, initiation speed for left targets improved when a rightward reach was required to these (from a left start) rather than a leftward reach. This suggests a deficit in programming leftward movements into left hemispace, in addition to any visual impairment, for parietal neglect. A control task confirmed that this effect of start position was due to the associated change in reach direction and not to afferent inputs from the hand as it rested at the start position. Frontal neglect patients were slow to execute reaches to left targets, regardless of movement direction. Right visual distractors slowed visual reaction times to left targets more than vice versa in frontal neglect patients, and likewise for reach execution times in parietal neglect patients, suggesting that visual distractors on the neglected side have less impact. Distractor effects were unaffected by start position in the frontal neglect group (suggesting a perceptual basis), but distractors slowed reach initiation in the parietal neglect group only from left and central starts. Taken together, these findings demonstrate a directional motor component to parietal but not frontal neglect, and suggest that in man the inferior parietal lobe plays a role not only in perception but also in the programming of selective reaches. These conclusions are related to recent single-unit data from the monkey parietal lobe.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
A. Del Cul, S. Dehaene, P. Reyes, E. Bravo, and A. Slachevsky
Causal role of prefrontal cortex in the threshold for access to consciousness
Brain, May 11, 2009; (2009) awp111v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
S. Rossit, P. Malhotra, K. Muir, I. Reeves, G. Duncan, K. Livingstone, H. Jackson, C. Hogg, P. Castle, G. Learmonth, et al.
No Neglect-Specific Deficits in Reaching Tasks
Cereb Cortex, March 12, 2009; (2009) bhp016v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
P. Malhotra, E. J. Coulthard, and M. Husain
Role of right posterior parietal cortex in maintaining attention to spatial locations over time
Brain, March 1, 2009; 132(3): 645 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
G. Koch, M. Oliveri, B. Cheeran, D. Ruge, E. L. Gerfo, S. Salerno, S. Torriero, B. Marconi, F. Mori, J. Driver, et al.
Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect
Brain, December 1, 2008; 131(12): 3147 - 3155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Vesia, X. Yan, D. Y. Henriques, L. E. Sergio, and J. D. Crawford
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Over Human Dorsal-Lateral Posterior Parietal Cortex Disrupts Integration of Hand Position Signals Into the Reach Plan
J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2008; 100(4): 2005 - 2014.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
G. Koch, M. F. Del Olmo, B. Cheeran, S. Schippling, C. Caltagirone, J. Driver, and J. C. Rothwell
Functional Interplay between Posterior Parietal and Ipsilateral Motor Cortex Revealed by Twin-Coil Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation during Reach Planning toward Contralateral Space
J. Neurosci., June 4, 2008; 28(23): 5944 - 5953.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
A. Battaglia-Mayer, M. Mascaro, and R. Caminiti
Temporal Evolution and Strength of Neural Activity in Parietal Cortex during Eye and Hand Movements
Cereb Cortex, June 1, 2007; 17(6): 1350 - 1363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. Sapir, J. B. Kaplan, B. J. He, and M. Corbetta
Anatomical Correlates of Directional Hypokinesia in Patients with Hemispatial Neglect
J. Neurosci., April 11, 2007; 27(15): 4045 - 4051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. E. Hillis, M. Newhart, J. Heidler, P. B. Barker, E. H. Herskovits, and M. Degaonkar
Anatomy of Spatial Attention: Insights from Perfusion Imaging and Hemispatial Neglect in Acute Stroke
J. Neurosci., March 23, 2005; 25(12): 3161 - 3167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Parton, P Malhotra, and M Husain
Hemispatial neglect
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2004; 75(1): 13 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeuroscientistHome page
B. R. Payne and R. J. Rushmore
Animal Models of Cerebral Neglect and Its Cancellation
Neuroscientist, December 1, 2003; 9(6): 446 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
O. Bjoertomt, A. Cowey, and V. Walsh
Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Brain, September 1, 2002; 125(9): 2012 - 2022.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.