Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Braun, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Varga, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Braun, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Varga, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 124, No. 10, 2028-2044, October 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

The neural organization of discourse

An H215O-PET study of narrative production in English and American sign language

A. R. Braun, A. Guillemin, L. Hosey and M. Varga

Language Section, Voice Speech and Language Branch, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Correspondence to: A. R. Braun, MD, Language Section, Voice Speech and Language Branch, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Building 10, Room 5N118A, 10 Center Drive MSC 1407, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA E-mail: brauna{at}nidcd.nih.gov

In order to identify brain regions that play an essential role in the production of discourse, H215O-PET scans were acquired during spontaneous generation of autobiographical narratives in English and in American Sign Language in hearing subjects who were native users of both. We compared languages that differ maximally in their mode of expression yet share the same core linguistic properties in order to differentiate the stages of discourse production: differences between the languages should reflect later, modality-dependent stages of phonological encoding and articulation; congruencies are more likely to reveal the anatomy of earlier modality-independent stages of conceptualization and lexical access. Common activations were detected in a widespread array of regions; left hemisphere language areas classically related to speech were also robustly activated during sign production, but the common neural architecture extended beyond the classical language areas and included extrasylvian regions in both right and left hemispheres. Furthermore, posterior perisylvian and basal temporal regions appear to play an integral role in spontaneous self-generated formulation and production of language, even in the absence of exteroceptive stimuli. Results additionally indicate that anterior and posterior areas may play distinct roles in early and late stages of language production, and suggest a novel model for lateralization of cerebral activity during the generation of discourse: progression from the early stages of lexical access to later stages of articulatory–motor encoding may constitute a progression from bilateral to left-lateralized activation. This pattern is not predicted by the standard Wernicke–Geschwind model, and may become apparent when language is produced in an ecologically valid context.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
R. Campbell, M. MacSweeney, and D. Waters
Sign Language and the Brain: A Review
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., January 1, 2008; 13(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
G.M. Schulz, M. Varga, K. Jeffires, C.L. Ludlow, and A.R. Braun
Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Vocalization: An H215O PET Study
Cereb Cortex, December 1, 2005; 15(12): 1835 - 1847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. L. C. Mitchell and T. J. Crow
Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: the forgotten hemisphere?
Brain, May 1, 2005; 128(5): 963 - 978.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
J.-F. Demonet, G. Thierry, and D. Cardebat
Renewal of the Neurophysiology of Language: Functional Neuroimaging
Physiol Rev, January 1, 2005; 85(1): 49 - 95.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
R. J S Wise
Language systems in normal and aphasic human subjects: functional imaging studies and inferences from animal studies
Br. Med. Bull., March 1, 2003; 65(1): 95 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
C. L. Grady, A. R. McIntosh, S. Beig, M. L. Keightley, H. Burian, and S. E. Black
Evidence from Functional Neuroimaging of a Compensatory Prefrontal Network in Alzheimer's Disease
J. Neurosci., February 1, 2003; 23(3): 986 - 993.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
S. C. Blank, S. K. Scott, K. Murphy, E. Warburton, and R. J. S. Wise
Speech production: Wernicke, Broca and beyond
Brain, August 1, 2002; 125(8): 1829 - 1838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
M. MacSweeney, B. Woll, R. Campbell, P. K. McGuire, A. S. David, S. C. R. Williams, J. Suckling, G. A. Calvert, and M. J. Brammer
Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users
Brain, July 1, 2002; 125(7): 1583 - 1593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.