Brain, Vol. 124, No. 11, 2162-2168,
November 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis
1 Department of Neurology and 2 Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Basel, Switzerland
Correspondence to:
Peter Fuhr, MD, Department of Neurology, University Hospital, CH-4031 Basel, SwitzerlandE-mail: Peter.Fuhr{at}unibas.ch
While evoked potentials are sensitive tools for diagnosing multiple sclerosis, little is known about their prognostic value and their role in determining the course of the disease. To validate the visual and motor evoked potentials (VEP and MEP) as measures for the course of multiple sclerosis, we examined prospectively 30 patients with relapsing–remitting or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), VEP and MEP were measured at entry and after 6, 12 and 24 months. The Spearman rank correlation was used for statistical analysis. Applying multiple regression in 15 randomized patients allowed derivation of a formula for predicting changes in EDSS score based on changes in MEP and VEP. Validation was done by comparing the predicted with the real changes in EDSS in the other 15 patients. The number of pathological VEP and MEP results correlated at all four measurement points with the EDSS (
0.6, P
0.01). When the latencies of VEP and MEP were combined using the sum of their Z scores, correlation with the EDSS was even more significant ( 0.6, P < 0.001). Changes over time of electrophysiological data and EDSS were also correlated ( = 0.43, P < 0.05). Moreover, VEP and MEP at baseline correlated with the EDSS after 2 years ( = 0.43,P= 0.03). Reliable prediction of the course of multiple sclerosis for individual patients is not possible from VEP and MEP data. However, we conclude that, for groups of patients with secondary progressive or relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis the combined testing of VEP and MEP yields numerical data that allow objective estimation of the course and prognosis of the disease.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Pelayo, X. Montalban, T. Minoves, D. Moncho, J. Rio, C. Nos, C. Tur, J. Castillo, A. Horga, M. Comabella, et al. Do multimodal evoked potentials add information to MRI in clinically isolated syndromes? Multiple Sclerosis, January 1, 2010; 16(1): 55 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Rico, B Audoin, J Franques, A Eusebio, F Reuter, I Malikova, A Ali Cherif, J Pouget, J Pelletier, and S Attarian Motor evoked potentials in clinically isolated syndrome suggestive of multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, March 1, 2009; 15(3): 355 - 362. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P Jung, A Beyerle, and U Ziemann Multimodal evoked potentials measure and predict disability progression in early relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, May 1, 2008; 14(4): 553 - 556. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Simo, P. Barsi, and Z. Aranyi Predictive role of evoked potential examinations in patients with clinically isolated optic neuritis in light of the revised McDonald criteria Multiple Sclerosis, May 1, 2008; 14(4): 472 - 478. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. Feuillet, J. Pelletier, L. Suchet, A. Rico, A. Ali Cherif, J. Pouget, and S. Attarian Prospective clinical and electrophysiological follow-up on a multiple sclerosis population treated with interferon beta-1 a: a pilot study Multiple Sclerosis, April 1, 2007; 13(3): 348 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L Leocani, M Rovaris, F M Boneschi, S Medaglini, P Rossi, V Martinelli, S Amadio, and G Comi Multimodal evoked potentials to assess the evolution of multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2006; 77(9): 1030 - 1035. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B A Kallmann, S Fackelmann, K V Toyka, P Rieckmann, and K Reiners Early abnormalities of evoked potentials and future disability in patients with multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, February 1, 2006; 12(1): 58 - 65. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J Liepert, D Mingers, C Heesen, T Baumer, and C Weiller Motor cortex excitability and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study Multiple Sclerosis, June 1, 2005; 11(3): 316 - 321. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B Weinstock-Guttman, M Baier, R Stockton, A Weinstock, T Justinger, F Munschauer, C Brownscheidle, J Williams, E Fisher, D Miller, et al. Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials as a measure of visual pathway pathology in multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis, October 1, 2003; 9(5): 529 - 534. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Curra, N. Modugno, M. Inghilleri, M. Manfredi, M. Hallett, and A. Berardelli Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques in clinical investigation Neurology, December 24, 2002; 59(12): 1851 - 1859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Schmierer, K. Irlbacher, P. Grosse, S. Roricht, and B.-U. Meyer Correlates of disability in multiple sclerosis detected by transcranial magnetic stimulation Neurology, October 22, 2002; 59(8): 1218 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|