Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanna-Pladdy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Foundas, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanna-Pladdy, B.
Right arrow Articles by Foundas, A. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 124, No. 12, 2513-2527, December 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Cortical and subcortical contributions to ideomotor apraxia

Analysis of task demands and error types

Brenda Hanna-Pladdy1,2, Kenneth M. Heilman1 and Anne L. Foundas3

1 Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 2 Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge 3 Deparment of Psychiatry and Neurology, Tulane University School of Medicine, and Neurology Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA

Correspondence to: Brenda Hanna-Pladdy, Department of Neurology, University of Florida Health Science Center, 100 South Newell Drive, Room L3-100, Box 100236 UFBI, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0236, USA pladdybh{at}neurology.ufl.edu

Ideomotor apraxia (IMA) is often associated with damage of the dominant parietal cortex, but many other lesion sites have been implicated suggesting that the praxis system is mediated by a distributed modular network. Although IMA has been reported with subcortical lesions, the role of subcortical structures in the praxis neural network has not been fully addressed. To ascertain the role of subcortical structures in praxis, we compared praxis performance on a variety of tasks in patients with left hemisphere cortical and subcortical lesions. The cortical patients presented with deficits in the production of transitive and intransitive gestures-to-verbal command and imitation, as well as impaired gesture discrimination. In contrast, the subcortical group demonstrated mild production-execution deficits for transitive pantomimes, but normal imitation and discrimination. Qualitative error analysis of production deficits, revealed that both patient groups produced timing errors and the full range of spatial errors. Whereas the subcortical group made more postural errors than the cortical group, sequencing, unrecognizable and no-response errors were only produced by the cortical group. The different profiles of praxis deficits associated with cortical and subcortical lesions, suggests that these structures may have different roles in praxis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. Pazzaglia, N. Smania, E. Corato, and S. M. Aglioti
Neural Underpinnings of Gesture Discrimination in Patients with Limb Apraxia
J. Neurosci., March 19, 2008; 28(12): 3030 - 3041.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
B. Hanna-Pladdy, K. M. Heilman, and A. L. Foundas
Ecological implications of ideomotor apraxia: Evidence from physical activities of daily living
Neurology, February 11, 2003; 60(3): 487 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.