Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fung, V. S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fung, V. S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Day, B. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 124, No. 2, 322-330, February 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

A dissociation between subjective and objective unsteadiness in primary orthostatic tremor

.

V. S. C. Fung*, D. Sauner and B. L. Day

MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK

Correspondence to: B. L. Day, MRC Human Movement and Balance Unit, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK E-mail: b.day{at}ion.ucl.ac.uk

Patients with primary orthostatic tremor (OT) experience a disabling sense of unsteadiness but rarely fall. In order to study the relationship between the development of subjective unsteadiness, objective unsteadiness and tremor, we recorded standing under four conditions (eyes open or closed, feet together or apart) in six patients with OT. Subjective unsteadiness was indicated by the patients on a four-point scale using a hand-held slider. Objective unsteadiness was assessed by measuring the path lengths of the centre of foot pressure and body motion at the level of the cervical spine. Tremor was measured by surface electromyography from leg and paraspinal muscles. OT patients were objectively more unsteady than controls. Objective unsteadiness also increased disproportionately in patients when standing with eyes closed. These findings suggest that balance control in OT is abnormal and shows increased visual dependence. Subjective unsteadiness increased from mild to severe over seconds to minutes. The increase was faster when standing with eyes closed or feet together. However, although escalating subjective unsteadiness was paralleled by an increase in leg tremor, there were no comparable changes in either paraspinal tremor or objective unsteadiness during the course of a stand. We conclude that there is a dissociation between subjective and objective unsteadiness. This implies that subjective unsteadiness does not arise simply from an awareness of increased body sway. We postulate that the sensation of unsteadiness arises from a tremulous disruption of proprioceptive afferent activity from the legs. This disturbance gives rise to increased co-contracting drive to the leg muscles in order to stiffen the joints and increase stability. Since muscle activity remains tremor-locked, the tremulous proprioceptive feedback is increased, which then further increases the sensation of unsteadiness, and so on in a vicious circle of escalating activity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
J K Krauss, R Weigel, C Blahak, H Bazner, H-H Capelle, E Grips, M Rittmann, and J C Wohrle
Chronic spinal cord stimulation in medically intractable orthostatic tremor
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2006; 77(9): 1013 - 1016.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. A. Norton, D. E. Wood, and B. L. Day
Is the spinal cord the generator of 16-Hz orthostatic tremor?
Neurology, February 24, 2004; 62(4): 632 - 634.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.