Brain, Vol. 124, No. 2, 361-368,
February 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
A study of the cortical processing of ano-rectal sensation using functional MRI
1 Gastrointestinal Science Group, Manchester University, Hope Hospital, 2 Imaging Science and Biomedical Engineering, Manchester University, Manchester and 3 Neuroscience Research Group, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr Q. Aziz, Hope Hospital, Stott Lane, Manchester M6 8HD, UK E-mail: QAZIZ{at}fs1.ho.man.ac.uk
Investigation of human ano-rectal physiology has concentrated largely on understanding the motor control of defecation and continence mechanisms. However, little is known of the physiology of ano-rectal sensation. There are important differences in the afferent innervation and sensory perception between the rectum and anal canal. This suggests that there could also be differences in the brain's processing of sensation from these two areas; however, this possibility remains unexplored. The aim of our study was to identify the cerebral areas processing anal (somatic) and rectal (visceral) sensation in healthy adults, using functional MRI. Eight male subjects with an age range of 21–39 years were studied on two separate occasions, one for rectal and the other for anal stimulation studies. Single shot gradient echo planar imaging was performed using a 1.5 tesla Phillips MRI scanner. For each subject, a series of 40 image sets containing 24 slices of the brain was obtained during periods of rapid phasic non-painful distension of the rectum or anal canal, alternating with rest periods, without stimulation. After motion correction, the images were analysed using cross correlation to identify the cerebral areas activated by the stimulus. Rectal stimulation resulted in bilateral activation of the inferior primary somatosensory, secondary somatosensory, sensory association, insular, peri-orbital, anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortices. Anal canal stimulation resulted in activation of areas similar to rectal stimulation, but the primary somatosensory cortex was activated at a more superior level, and there was no anterior cingulate activation. In conclusion, anal and rectal sensation resulted in a similar pattern of cortical activation, including areas involved with spatial discrimination, attention and affect. The differences in sensory perception from these two regions can be explained by their different representation in the primary somatosensory cortex. The anterior cingulate cortex was only activated by rectal stimulation, suggesting that the viscera have a greater representation on the limbic cortex than somatic structures, and this explains the greater autonomic responses evoked by visceral sensation in comparison with somatic sensation.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. D. Lane, S. R. Waldstein, H. D. Critchley, S. W. G. Derbyshire, D. A. Drossman, T. D. Wager, N. Schneiderman, M. A. Chesney, J. R. Jennings, W. R. Lovallo, et al. The Rebirth of Neuroscience in Psychosomatic Medicine, Part II: Clinical Applications and Implications for Research Psychosom Med, February 1, 2009; 71(2): 135 - 151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Tracy, N. Goyal, A. Flanders, R. Weening, J. Laskas, P. Natale, and B. Waldron Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Attention to One's Heartbeat Psychosom Med, November 1, 2007; 69(9): 952 - 960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Leserman and D. A. Drossman Relationship of Abuse History to Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders and Symptoms: Some Possible Mediating Mechanisms Trauma Violence Abuse, July 1, 2007; 8(3): 331 - 343. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. J. Coen, L. J. Gregory, L. Yaguez, E. Amaro Jr., M. Brammer, S. C. R. Williams, and Q. Aziz Reproducibility of human brain activity evoked by esophageal stimulation using functional magnetic resonance imaging Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, July 1, 2007; 293(1): G188 - G197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. L. Kwan, N. E. Diamant, G. Pope, K. Mikula, D. J. Mikulis, and K. D. Davis Abnormal forebrain activity in functional bowel disorder patients with chronic pain Neurology, October 25, 2005; 65(8): 1268 - 1277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Lawal, M. Kern, A. Sanjeevi, C. Hofmann, and R. Shaker Cingulate cortex: a closer look at its gut-related functional topography Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): G722 - G730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D A Drossman Brain imaging and its implications for studying centrally targeted treatments in irritable bowel syndrome: a primer for gastroenterologists Gut, May 1, 2005; 54(5): 569 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A R Hobson and Q Aziz Brain imaging and functional gastrointestinal disorders: has it helped our understanding? Gut, August 1, 2004; 53(8): 1198 - 1206. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L J Gregory, L Yaguez, S C R Williams, C Altmann, S J Coen, V Ng, M J Brammer, D G Thompson, and Q Aziz Cognitive modulation of the cerebral processing of human oesophageal sensation using functional magnetic resonance imaging Gut, December 1, 2003; 52(12): 1671 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. R. Hobson and Q. Aziz Central Nervous System Processing of Human Visceral Pain in Health and Disease Physiology, June 1, 2003; 18(3): 109 - 114. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. A. Strigo, G. H. Duncan, M. Boivin, and M. C. Bushnell Differentiation of Visceral and Cutaneous Pain in the Human Brain J Neurophysiol, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 3294 - 3303. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|