Brain, Vol. 124, No. 4, 826-837,
April 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Modulation of presynaptic inhibition and disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition during voluntary movement in spasticity
.
Division of Neurophysiology, Department of Medical Physiology, The Panum Institute, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej, Copenhagen, Denmark
Correspondence to:
Professor Jens Bo Nielsen, Division of Neurophysiology, Department of Medical Physiology, The Panum Institute, Copenhagen University, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark E-mail: J.B.Nielsen{at}mfi.ku.dk
The aim of the study was to investigate whether impaired control of transmission in spinal inhibitory pathways contributes to the functional disability of patients with spasticity. To this end, transmission in the pathways mediating disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition and presynaptic inhibition was investigated in 23 healthy subjects and 20 patients with spastic multiple sclerosis during ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion. In healthy subjects, but not in spastic patients, the soleus H reflex was depressed at the onset of dorsiflexion (300 ms rise time, 20% of maximal voluntary effort). At the onset of plantar flexion, the soleus H reflex was more facilitated in the healthy subjects than in the patients. The H reflex increased more with increasing level of tonic plantar flexion and decreased more with dorsiflexion in the healthy subjects than in the spastic patients. Transmission in the disynaptic Ia reciprocal inhibitory pathway from ankle dorsiflexors to plantar flexors was investigated by conditioning the soleus H reflex by previous stimulation of the common peroneal nerve (conditioning-test interval 2–3 ms; stimulation intensity 1.05 times the motor response threshold). At the onset of dorsiflexion, stimulation of the common peroneal nerve evoked a significantly larger inhibition than at rest in the healthy subjects but not in the spastic patients. At the onset of plantar flexion the inhibition decreased in the healthy subjects, but because only weak inhibition was observed at rest in the patients it was not possible to determine whether a similar decrease occurred in this group. There were no differences in the modulation of inhibition during tonic plantar flexion and dorsiflexion in the two populations. Presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents terminating on soleus motor neurones was evaluated from the monosynaptic Ia facilitation of the soleus H reflex evoked by femoral nerve stimulation. Femoral nerve facilitation was decreased at the onset of dorsiflexion and increased at the onset of plantar flexion in the healthy subjects and patients, but the changes were significantly greater in the healthy subjects. There was no difference between the two populations in the modulation of presynaptic inhibition during tonic plantar flexion and dorsiflexion. It is suggested that the abnormal regulation of disynaptic reciprocal inhibition and presynaptic inhibition in patients with spasticity is responsible for the abnormal modulation of stretch reflexes in relation to voluntary movement in these patients. Lack of an increase in reciprocal inhibition and presynaptic inhibition at the onset of dorsiflexion may be responsible for the tendency to elicitation of unwanted stretch reflex activity and co-contraction of antagonistic muscles in patients with spasticity.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. K. Thompson, K. L. Estabrooks, S. Chong, and R. B. Stein Spinal Reflexes in Ankle Flexor and Extensor Muscles After Chronic Central Nervous System Lesions and Functional Electrical Stimulation Neurorehabil Neural Repair, February 1, 2009; 23(2): 133 - 142. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Centonze, G. Koch, V. Versace, F. Mori, S. Rossi, L. Brusa, K. Grossi, F. Torelli, C. Prosperetti, A. Cervellino, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex ameliorates spasticity in multiple sclerosis Neurology, March 27, 2007; 68(13): 1045 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 X. Y. Chen, L. Chen, Y. Chen, and J. R. Wolpaw Operant Conditioning of Reciprocal Inhibition in Rat Soleus Muscle J Neurophysiol, October 1, 2006; 96(4): 2144 - 2150. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Morita, M. Shindo, H. Momoi, S. Yanagawa, S. Ikeda, and N. Yanagisawa Lack of modulation of Ib inhibition during antagonist contraction in spasticity. Neurology, July 11, 2006; 67(1): 52 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J A Burne, V L Carleton, and N J O'Dwyer The spasticity paradox: movement disorder or disorder of resting limbs? J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2005; 76(1): 47 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Crone, N. T. Petersen, J. E. Nielsen, N. L. Hansen, and J. B. Nielsen Reciprocal inhibition and corticospinal transmission in the arm and leg in patients with autosomal dominant pure spastic paraparesis (ADPSP) Brain, December 1, 2004; 127(12): 2693 - 2702. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Frigon, D. F. Collins, and E. P. Zehr Effect of Rhythmic Arm Movement on Reflexes in the Legs: Modulation of Soleus H-Reflexes and Somatosensory Conditioning J Neurophysiol, April 1, 2004; 91(4): 1516 - 1523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J P R Dick The deep tendon and the abdominal reflexes J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, February 1, 2003; 74(2): 150 - 153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Crone, L. L. Johnsen, F. Biering-Sorensen, and J. B. Nielsen Appearance of reciprocal facilitation of ankle extensors from ankle flexors in patients with stroke or spinal cord injury Brain, February 1, 2003; 126(2): 495 - 507. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. E. Butler and C. K. Thomas Effects of sustained stimulation on the excitability of motoneurons innervating paralyzed and control muscles J Appl Physiol, February 1, 2003; 94(2): 567 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 I. Hammar and E. Jankowska Modulatory Effects of alpha 1-,alpha 2-, and beta -Receptor Agonists on Feline Spinal Interneurons with Monosynaptic Input from Group I Muscle Afferents J. Neurosci., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 332 - 338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|