Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (92)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Husain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kennard, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Husain, M.
Right arrow Articles by Kennard, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Brain, Vol. 124, No. 5, 941-952, May 2001
© 2001 Oxford University Press

Impaired spatial working memory across saccades contributes to abnormal search in parietal neglect

Masud Husain1, Sabira Mannan1, Tim Hodgson1, Ewa Wojciulik2, Jon Driver2 and Christopher Kennard1

1 Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital Campus and 2 Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK

Correspondence to: Masud Husain, Division of Neuroscience and Psychological Medicine, Imperial College School of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital Campus, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, UK E-mail: m.husain@ic.ac.uk

Visual neglect of left space following right parietal damage in humans involves a lateral bias in attention, apparent in many search tasks. We hypothesized that parietal neglect may also involve a failure to remember which locations have already been examined during visual search: an impairment in retaining searched locations across saccades. Using a new paradigm, we monitored gaze during search, while simultaneously probing whether observers judged they had found a new target, or judged instead that they were re-fixating a previously examined target. A patient with left neglect following focal right parietal infarction repeatedly re-fixated right locations. Critically, he often failed to remember that these locations had already been searched, treating old targets as new discoveries at an abnormal rate. In comparison, healthy age-matched control subjects rarely re-fixated targets, and mistook old targets as new targets even more rarely. The frequency of such mistakes in the parietal patient, for different conditions, correlated with the severity of his neglect. Control experiments indicated no perceptual localization deficit in non-search tasks. These results suggest a deficit in retaining searched locations across saccades in parietal neglect, in addition to the lateral spatial bias. Moreover, the former deficit exacerbates the latter, such that patients do not realize that the rightward locations favoured by their bias have already been examined during previous fixations and, for this reason, they saccade back to them repeatedly. The combination of the two deficits (a lateral bias plus a deficit in retaining locations already searched) may thus explain the pathological pattern of search that characterizes parietal neglect: why stimuli on the right are re-examined recursively, as if being searched for the first time, and hence why stimuli on the left continue to be ignored even with unlimited viewing time. These proposals accord with recent electrophysiological and functional imaging data, demonstrating posterior parietal involvement in the retention of target locations across saccades.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BrainHome page
J. H. Bultitude, R. D. Rafal, and A. List
Prism adaptation reverses the local processing bias in patients with right temporo-parietal junction lesions
Brain, June 1, 2009; 132(6): 1669 - 1677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
M. E. Berryhill, L. Phuong, L. Picasso, R. Cabeza, and I. R. Olson
Parietal Lobe and Episodic Memory: Bilateral Damage Causes Impaired Free Recall of Autobiographical Memory
J. Neurosci., December 26, 2007; 27(52): 14415 - 14423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. Ptak, A. Schnider, L. Golay, and R. Muri
A non-spatial bias favouring fixated stimuli revealed in patients with spatial neglect
Brain, December 1, 2007; 130(12): 3211 - 3222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cereb CortexHome page
P. Bartolomeo, M. Thiebaut de Schotten, and F. Doricchi
Left Unilateral Neglect as a Disconnection Syndrome
Cereb Cortex, November 1, 2007; 17(11): 2479 - 2490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
G. Rode, P. Revol, Y. Rossetti, D. Boisson, and P. Bartolomeo
Looking while imagining: The influence of visual input on representational neglect
Neurology, February 6, 2007; 68(6): 432 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
G. M. S. Nys, M. J. E. v. Zandvoort, H. B. v. d. Worp, L. J. Kappelle, and E. H. F. d. Haan
Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of perseverative responses in subacute stroke.
Brain, August 1, 2006; 129(Pt 8): 2148 - 2157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
H.-O. Karnath and M. Dieterich
Spatial neglect--a vestibular disorder?
Brain, February 1, 2006; 129(2): 293 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
P. Malhotra, H. R. Jager, A. Parton, R. Greenwood, E. D. Playford, M. M. Brown, J. Driver, and M. Husain
Spatial working memory capacity in unilateral neglect
Brain, February 1, 2005; 128(2): 424 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
E Wojciulik, C Rorden, K Clarke, M Husain, and J Driver
Group study of an "undercover" test for visuospatial neglect: invisible cancellation can reveal more neglect than standard cancellation
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 75(9): 1356 - 1358.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
V. W. Mark, A. J. Woods, K. K. Ball, D. L. Roth, and M. Mennemeier
Disorganized search on cancellation is not a consequence of neglect
Neurology, July 13, 2004; 63(1): 78 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
M. Zhang and S. Barash
Persistent LIP Activity in Memory Antisaccades: Working Memory For a Sensorimotor Transformation
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2004; 91(3): 1424 - 1441.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
R. J. Leigh and C. Kennard
Using saccades as a research tool in the clinical neurosciences
Brain, March 1, 2004; 127(3): 460 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Parton, P Malhotra, and M Husain
Hemispatial neglect
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2004; 75(1): 13 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BrainHome page
L. Battelli, P. Cavanagh, P. Martini, and J. J. S. Barton
Bilateral deficits of transient visual attention in right parietal patients
Brain, October 1, 2003; 126(10): 2164 - 2174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. R. Friedman-Hill, L. C. Robertson, R. Desimone, and L. G. Ungerleider
Posterior parietal cortex and the filtering of distractors
PNAS, April 1, 2003; 100(7): 4263 - 4268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.